Originally Posted by
William W
I think, from memory, as one looks front on to the monument (i.e. the aspect the image is made), there is a ground slope from right to left. The curb at the road is quite high by comparison to a point at sixty feet to the left. So I think it is actuality and not odd that the left hand end of stone work appears taller than the right hand end.
There’s some minor keystone distortion in the image (and maybe a little bit of barrel distortion), but not very much and the Keystone Distortion can be easily corrected: probably that was caused by the camera being slightly inclined downward.
Don’t know what is meant by the phrase “perspective distortion” - that phrase is often used to describe either Foreshortening or Elongation: but I can see no evidence of either existing in this image. Again, from memory, to attain that Horizontal Field of View, using an 18mm lens on a Nikon APS-C Format Camera, I think that Bruce would have been standing about 30 feet from the front edges of the stonework - and that’s not going to provide any perceivable Foreshortening or Elongation, if that's what is meant by "perspective distortion".
In any case: apropos comments pertaining to the vibrance; colours; and other 'artistic' interpretive post production qualities etc., I thought that the image’s main purpose was that it be an image of historical record, but maybe I misunderstood the Photographer’s purpose?
WW