As someone who gets paid to do stats I can tell you that "greater statistical weight" depends on how you define your metrics. I have not desire to derail this thread. You lamented the derision of DPR and I offered one anecdotal reason to explain my personal dislike of the forum. That is all.
Michael
Then clearly you need no further education on confidence level, sample size, population, etc.
Fine.I have not desire to derail this thread. You lamented the derision of DPR and I offered one anecdotal reason to explain my personal dislike of the forum. That is all.
Michael
Last edited by xpatUSA; 31st May 2017 at 05:17 PM.
A keen observation? Off topic, but as a matter of fact, many of the treatments medical doctors use were created by PhDs, or by the relatively few people who hold both degrees. Ditto, evaluating which are safe and effective--done in part by people with PhDs in fields like biostatistics. And there are the PhDs in fields like physics who are responsible for a lot of the electronics we all use routinely. Hmm. What about the chemists? Etc., etc.Medical Doctors and people with PhDs are both called "Doctor." A friend of mine made a keen observation when he asked a doctor "Are the you kind of doctor that fixes people or the kind that corrects people?"
Time to close this thread down.
The last few comments seem to have no bearing on the original question and are not headed anywhere meaningful.