Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Camila B&W Portrait

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Chile South America
    Posts
    268
    Real Name
    Javier Ramirez

    Camila B&W Portrait

    Camila B&W Portrait

  2. #2
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,205
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Camila B&W Portrait

    It is a lovely portrait, but has some serious problems.

    1. The area above your model's head and the gaps between the railing are super bright. The human visual system goes to extremely bright or high contrast areas, so we see those parts of the image rather than your subject;

    2. You are using the "rule of thirds" and have your models eyes sitting on one of those lines. That rule does not work for this image,

    3. The nose cuts the cheekbone, so the eye behind the nose looks strange. This is one of those rules of portraiture that usually applies.


    Camila B&W Portrait

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    lancashire UK
    Posts
    339
    Real Name
    roy

    Re: Camila B&W Portrait

    I would agree with Manfred, I also have a dislike for amputation
    Roy

  4. #4
    pnodrog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Nomadic but not homeless, ex N.Z. now Aust.
    Posts
    4,154
    Real Name
    Paul

    Re: Camila B&W Portrait

    Quote Originally Posted by royent View Post
    I would agree with Manfred, I also have a dislike for amputation
    Roy
    You poms are so squeamish. She wouldn't have felt a thing.

    Signed colonial stirrer...

  5. #5
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,205
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Camila B&W Portrait

    Quote Originally Posted by royent View Post
    I would agree with Manfred, I also have a dislike for amputation
    Roy
    Agreed and good catch - I missed mentioning that one.

  6. #6
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,880
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Camila B&W Portrait

    I agree with Manfred's comments, but I disagree about one point: amputations. In general, they often don't work, but rules shouldn't be ironclad. If it was occasionally good enough for Renior (e.g., https://www.wikiart.org/en/pierre-au...madame-henriot), it's good enough for me. In this case, the amputation didn't bother me much because its in an out-of-focus, bacground area.

  7. #7
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,205
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Camila B&W Portrait

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    I agree with Manfred's comments, but I disagree about one point: amputations. In general, they often don't work, but rules shouldn't be ironclad. If it was occasionally good enough for Renior (e.g., https://www.wikiart.org/en/pierre-au...madame-henriot), it's good enough for me. In this case, the amputation didn't bother me much because its in an out-of-focus, bacground area.
    Carefully said, amputations do work, but the general rule is that they should be applied above the joint, which usually minimizes their impact. Cutting through the joint(s) or just above the joint does draw attention to the area.

    You are quite right, Dan. If the amputation that breaks that rule is done in a way that one does not notice, one can get away with it.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •