What I liked most about the two ladybirds in mating position is that the shield of the one at the back seemed translucent. With the help of the sun you can see the dark wings beneath the shield. I was lucky with the reflection of the light I guess.
Printable View
It might work Geoff, or some reflection material above your "studio". You might try a reflecting umbrella I guess.
I have a small box (formerly storage for A4 paper), clad in white, that I use for macro photos now and then. The light is difficult in there, because of the size, so the flash (even when used off camera) is always close by. Still looking for a better solution...
One of a series of shots of visitors to my insect attractors--white rhododendron blossoms.
Paper wasp
http://www.pbase.com/art1/image/143055995/original.jpg
(Click for full size)
Thanks, Peter. It's almost full frame, with just tiny slivers cropped off the top and right side. The camera is a Canon 5D, and the lens is a Canon 100mm macro (non-IS version). It also included a Kenko extension tube. I think it was the 36mm one, but I don't remember for sure, because I swap the different lengths in and out as needed, and extension tubes aren't captured in the exif data.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7267/7...897f4abe_b.jpg
Tachinidae (thanks Geoff)
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8166/7...ee1a374d_b.jpg
Normal fly (I think)
I think, Peter, that although the first fly appears to have cross veins at the wing tips, like Syrphidae (hoverflies) those veins are too far back from the wing tips.
So considering it's bristly appearance, I would suggest one of the Tachinidae family. And what I am actually seeing in the wing tips is the way that their 4th long wing vein sharply bends forwards. But it is a slightly strange camera angle.
If so, it is a tricky family which I haven't studied very much, and we would need more angles to attempt some ID keys. But an expert in them might easily recognise it.
Here is a bee which I found amusing.
'I am turning right'!
http://i48.tinypic.com/2ngdbty.jpg
The shot is far from perfect but I just liked the way it held it's right wing out as it turned right. As though it was signaling it's intention to change direction.
How blue is a bluebell?
These always give me problems with getting the colour correct. From a distance they look a strong darkish blue, but when you get close they are a lot lighter in colour and there is a lot of magenta mixed with the blue.
There are a few other tricky flowers like this, and Irises are another typical example.
I think I've got this one about right after slightly tweaking the purples during Raw conversion.
http://i50.tinypic.com/2cfpeg.jpg
And the model (Holly Blue) is another difficult subject. When flying, the wing upperparts are a dense rather pastel shade of mid blue. But at rest, when open, they photograph as a rather unattractive dull slatey blue.
Peter. Are you seeing any Harlequin Ladybirds this year? I found the odd one last year, but nothing yet this year.
Excellent shot Geoff.
Are you using a macro lens or something else?
Yes, Bobo. Sigma 180 mm macro lens plus 1.4x converter on a 7D.
Tripod and Speedlite flash. I normally make the camera settings in manual mode, to suit the scene, then adjust the flash compensation to suit. I mostly use flash for all macro shots even in sunshine as a bit of fill flash helps to prevent harsh shadows.
For flower photos, when I want to show a whole flower, I have found that my 24-105 L lens is sometimes better.
However, for live, in the wild, insect shots I usually reckon that I'm not going to be able to get closer than 12 ins before the subject gets scared away; so greater magnification is required. A lot of entomologists like the Sigma 150 but I have found that when I need to see specific parts of an insect for identification a bit more magnification is required.
Incidentally, I started macro work by adding a 25 mm extension tube to a Canon 70-300 lens, which was a relatively cheap and fairly effective starter. But, of course, I soon wanted even better.
This site should explain all about Harlequin Ladybirds, although it is UK based http://www.harlequin-survey.org/reco...istinction.htm
It is an Asian species which was introduced into USA then Europe for pest control. They grow faster and eat more pests than native ladybirds. In some areas they appeared to be increasing in numbers so rapidly that there were fears for some native species.
The eventual outcome is currently uncertain. In some locations they do appear to have increased rather alarmingly; but elsewhere they are still something of a rarity.
That hoverfly has certainly been amongst the pollen. Is it feeding on Forget Me Not flowers (Myosotis species)?
Good sharp shots. It is Helophilus pendulus female.
The deep dip in the middle wing vein places it amongst the Eristalini family and there are only a few members of that group which have those classic thorax stripes. The dark face stripe and the hind tibia being less than half black, both clearly visible in the last photo, places it as H. pendulus.
Dragonfly with dinnerhttp://farm8.staticflickr.com/7226/7...93f35f9cdc.jpg
_DSC0304 by kutsies pics, on Flickr
Yes, we seem to have a lot of forget-me-nots at the moment;)
They do seem to attract most of the honey seeking insects at the moment, so bear with me please...
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7082/7...dc55aa9b_b.jpg
syrphidae
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8018/6...cbd5b4ac_b.jpg
fly
If I was a small aphid I would probably be worried, but somehow I can't really see ladybirds as predators. They are just so...nice.
Oops!
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7054/7...15559770_b.jpg
Sorry about the focus being off on the ladybird. This happened quite unexpectedly and I just got a few clicks in.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8158/7...231e1fdc_b.jpg
Ladybird
I always wonder how much energy these little guys burn with all that flying. They seem to rest a lot as well.
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5345/7...c656b1d3_b.jpg
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7187/7...5929e682_b.jpg
Syrphidae