Sorry misread the post...emm..if you recieve an envelope with spiders in just put it in the bin
Sorry misread the post...emm..if you recieve an envelope with spiders in just put it in the bin
Peter,
If my ID is correct (there are several species that are rather similar in this family), this could be the Waved Sphinx Moth (Ceratomia undulosa) of Silence of the Lambs fame... http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/cundulos.htm
- Bill
I was calling him a giant tomato bug. I was close, he's a giant tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta L. Looks like if I had left him, he (or she?) could have gotten up to almost 10 cm in length. You were right. They turn into sphinx moths. Here's a link on tomato and tobacco hornworms: http://tammysrecipes.com/tomato_hornworms
Searching for insects and photographing them can vary considerably in 'excitement value' from hour to hour, particularly if you are also interested in submitting records of your finds.
One single sighting can change a mediocre experience into a real 'wow day'.
Recently I was having a somewhat subdued day as the 'strimmer men' had devastated the path through a wood and only a few common insects remained. So I explored a nearby small field instead.
On the first flower that I examined I saw this hoverfly.
Brachypalpoides lentus, an uncommon species which I only glimpse once or twice a year if I'm lucky.
Eventually I had taken sufficient shots and turned to examine the next flower. And . . .
Volucella zonaria another uncommon hoverfly, and just as willing to be photographed. At one time it flew off but actually returned to settle even closer. In fact so close that I actually had to slide my tripod back a bit in order to refocus at a different angle.
But now - the rain and wind has returned; but I suppose that will give me a bit of 'processing time'.
ps. I see that the heading line has changed. I didn't notice that until it was too late.
Last edited by Geoff F; 20th June 2012 at 06:04 PM. Reason: extra line
Geoff,
I definitely know exactly what you're talking about! That is really cool that you scored two uncommon specimens. Sometimes I feel I can get the same feeling if I can get that interesting pose that I've been trying for... or just that good bit of light or whatever combination of items that come together to give you that one good shot of the day.
Out of curiosity, you say you submit records of your finds. Are you working with local scientists or something to conduct species studies in your area?
- Bill
Yes, I submit my sightings to the local county recorder and a number of internet sites for specific species.
For example the UK Hoverfly Recording Scheme wants regular records of all hoverfly species including the commoner ones. Getting a 'full spectrum' of records helps to indicate any substantial increase or decrease in numbers.
http://www.hoverfly.org.uk/portal.php
This year, that organisation is holding a Big Hoverfly Watch where, during particular weeks, volunteers visit a particular location and send in their sightings.
Last edited by Geoff F; 20th June 2012 at 06:20 PM. Reason: link added
I see we have the original heading again.
I always find photographing mating insects is difficult due to focus depth problems. Getting absolutely square on to the can be a problem, particularly when they keep moving, and there is a requirement for 'width as well as length'.
Just focusing on one and letting the other blur into the distance is one answer, but when there are noticeable differences between the sexes I like to show both if I can.
Mating Sawflies (of unknown species)
and a strange looking wasp. One of the Ichneumon Wasp family but they are extremely difficult to identify. Virtually impossible from photographs.
The abdomen really is connected to the thorax, just difficult to see.
ps. I'm not familiar with Canadian beetles, Louise; but identification usually involves counting the number and shape of the antennae segments and toes on all legs. Plus a number of other subtle differences between species.