Morning Nap

[Steve S]

[ilovelucydog]

There's really nothing to say.

[MiniChris]

What is that, Steve...1f:/2.8 at 200 yards? I've seen some narrowed depth of field shots in my time, but have to admit, that one just about takes the prize... It's cute and you certainly have a good eye for finding these little critters but the fore and rear bokeh in this shot takes away too much for my tastes. However, please don't stop shooting these guys as your workis exemplary (well, most of the time ).

[Steve S]

There's really nothing to say.

Thanks mary

[Steve S]

What is that, Steve...1f:/2.8 at 200 yards? I've seen some narrowed depth of field shots in my time, but have to admit, that one just about takes the prize... It's cute and you certainly have a good eye for finding these little critters but the fore and rear bokeh in this shot takes away too much for my tastes. However, please don't stop shooting these guys as your workis exemplary (well, most of the time ).

I wish i had a f/1 or a f/2.8 lens. Perhaps if you shot a little more, you would have learned what i did....................you can create the illusion of shallow depth of field, under certain conditions. Which is why i really like this shot (at f/4 and 50 yards.)

[MiniChris]

I am perfectly capable of creating that kind of artifical depth of field, but I don't because as I stated above, it doesn't appeal to me. I love your work, Steve, just didn't like that shot. The remark was meant to be funny. Sorry you were offended.

[Steve S]

I am perfectly capable of creating that kind of artifical depth of field, but I don't because as I stated above, it doesn't appeal to me. I love your work, Steve, just didn't like that shot. The remark was meant to be funny. Sorry you were offended.

No hard feeling chris. That's the problem with the internet, sometimes we read things the wrong way. My apologies as well.

[Sahil]

That one is AWESOME@!!!!