Last edited by Colin Southern; 19th August 2011 at 11:36 PM.
Yeah, I was careless in my text. I know it's really "near-infrared", but then I didn't want to get into that whole discussion infrared vs. near-infrared, and Brian was already tagging the Canon system as "infrared", so I took the shortcut. This is why I want a Canon analog to "CLS" as a short, simple term we can use for the Canon proprietary near-infrared visible-light wireless eTTL communication system. Damnit.
And agreed, the ST-E2 seriously shows its age. But you still can't use PWs to autofocus in the dark, or a sports car to take a canyon bike trail.![]()
BTW, the autofocus assist on the ST-E2 is the one thing the Yongnuo clone couldn't replicate.
I'm going by a POTN thread on the YN ST-E2 clone. I was feeling a bit grumpy, having bought a Canon ST-E2 a few years ago, but after reading that, I was happy again.![]()
What you should be asking is why is it only $500 in the USA.![]()
Only $500????
I just bought a 430 for $250 at my local Best Buy.
The ETTL-2 is VERY nice for bounce flash, though it isn't playing nice with my yongnuo flashes![]()