Thanks to all for your fascinating thoughts on my photo
Just a few reflections:
- There are 2 kinds of helpful comment - practical suggestions about eg cloning away distractions, which are easier to see in other people's pics but maybe less so in one's own, and observations which come down to interpretation and taste. I love to hear how others respond to my images, and it doesn't matter at all whether I happen to agree. Its just really good to find out how the photo looks through the eyes of others, it expands my understanding and helps me to grow as a photographer.
- You might be interested to know that of all the versions of my pic here, including my own, the one I like most is Tommy's!
It naturalises the colours and tones so well, makes the photo more of a unity. Note, though, that the real scene was brighter than Tommy's - it was a summer day even though cloudy, the greens were brighter and fresher. So 'natural' isn't necessarily the same as 'truer to life', a point worth bearing in mind I think.
To my own mind, the cropped version is also more harmonious and easier on the eye than the uncropped version. However, I also bear in mind that at the time I took the photo, I was responding to melancholy feelings aroused by the scene, and not thinking that this is a satisfyingly peaceful image! And obviously I could see the road heading off to nowhere, that was part of the scene, it wasn't 'cropped'!
- On the other hand, the title itself gives away my inner conflict about the pic: 'lonely' what? lonely building? lonely road? Lonely photographer? (Of course what photographer could be lonely with camera in hand! Not to mention the wife and dog who were behind the lens with me!!
) So to me, the uncropped version is restless and unharmonious but truer to the scene, the cropped version makes a more satisfying but less interesting photo!!! How's that for an outcome?
Best to all, David