Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Need f-stops explained

  1. #21
    arith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Burton on Trent, UK
    Posts
    4,788
    Real Name
    Steve

    Re: Need f-stops explained

    Quote Originally Posted by Colin Southern View Post
    It's been said that the aeroplane of the future will have only a single pilot and a dog in the cockpit. The pilot's sole job is to feed the dog. The dog's sole job is to bite the pilot if he touches anything!
    I've been informed that is what it is like now; in fact Air France springs to mind with pilots stalling after disengaging autopilot.

    We also have Russian pilots that apply brakes on take off; so maybe all that is needed is blow up pilots just to keep the passengers happy, although they don't frighten easily since they wasn't too bothered when a wheel fell off a FlyBe Dash aircraft.

    Won't catch me in one of those things without sedation.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    17,660
    Real Name
    Have a guess :)

    Re: Need f-stops explained

    Quote Originally Posted by arith View Post
    I've been informed that is what it is like now; in fact Air France springs to mind with pilots stalling after disengaging autopilot.
    Hmmm, perhaps ... I'm waiting for the official report though. From what I've read from other long haul jet jocks there may well be a lot more to it.

    If anyone is keen for some good insights into the cockpit of an Airbus, check out flightlevel390.blogspot.com.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Leiden, Netherlands
    Posts
    185
    Real Name
    Hero

    Re: Need f-stops explained

    Quote Originally Posted by arith View Post
    Won't catch me in one of those things without sedation.
    *Doesn't want to know the amount of sedation needed in roadtraffic*

  4. #24
    arith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Burton on Trent, UK
    Posts
    4,788
    Real Name
    Steve

    Re: Need f-stops explained

    Here's a bit of fun; most of all I know is from simulators and it looks a bit harder than square root of 2. Can't see what its got to do with photography and I don't understand the captain.

    I thought the Airbus was unsinkable; oh yes I remember reading about the reliability of safety critical systems in the 80's.

    http://www.myaviationschool.com/free...simulator.html

  5. #25
    FrankMi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Fort Mill, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    6,294
    Real Name
    Frank Miller

    Re: Need f-stops explained

    As long as we are so far off topic that we may never find our way back,
    The dog's sole job is to bite the pilot if he touches anything!
    ...

    Each year, bush pilots gather in Alaska to compete for Shortest Takeoff and Landing (STOL) distances.
    In a competition where less is more, Doyle’s total takeoff AND landing distance was a mere 78 feet.
    That’s 43 feet for the takeoff and 35 feet for the landing.

    http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=133255

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Taupo, New Zealand
    Posts
    54
    Real Name
    Keith

    Re: Need f-stops explained

    -To get back to the subject of f stops, this is taken from the Focal Encyclopaedia of Photography Desk Edition, 1978 reprint

    Relative Aperture: THis is the ratio of the focal length of the lens to the diameter of the effective aperture. For example, if a lens has a focal length of 100mm and the effective aperture has a diameter of 25mm, the relative aperture is 100/25 = 4. This is also known as the f-number and is expressed as f/4,f4, 1:4 etc.
    The light passing power of the lens, and hence the exposure required in a photograph, depends on the relative aperture. Lenses of different focal length and different effective apertures still form an image of the same brightness, other things being equal, if the relative aperture or f-number is the same. (in practice light losses by absorption and reflectioncomplicate the situation slightly). In common photographic parlance the term aperture is taken to mean the relative aperture.
    The light transmitted through the lens is proportional to the area of the effective aperture and hence inversely proportional to the square of the relative aperture of f-number. In other words a lens set to f4 passes four times the light of a lens set to f-8.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •