Sorry ladies & gents,
I just don't get it. I saw it here
http://www.businessinsider.com/andre...e-2011-11?op=1
along with a number of other "great" and valuable "art".
Call me what you will but I see images posted on this site and many other sites, daily, that I think are better images than this and that I would be prepared to pay more money for.
Is that the answer that images can be pleasing to the eye but may not be art or is there some other answer that only the educated "art critics" are able to understand and explain