The other one....

[Daisy Mae]

The other one by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/sharon_reid_2010/]Sharon Reid2010[/

[Geoff F]

Yes, it works well for me.

[Daisy Mae]

Thanks Geoff. Am road testing a new tripod.

[Daisy Mae]

and another two


Tulip by Sharon Reid2010, on Flickr

...risky one here.


Nostalgia by Sharon Reid2010, on Flickr

[Geoff F]

Just a little bit of noise in the background on that one Sharon. What often works for me is to lightly go over those areas with a Blur Brush. But don't overdo it; just slightly reduce the noise. Some 'speckling' adds to the interest.

[Donald]

Just what Geoff has said .... in both his posts.

#1 really made an impact. So much so that when I scrolled down to #2 I was a bit disappointed. But then I closed the thread and came back to #2, opened it in the lightbox and saw a completely different image.

For me, this was one of those occasions when what I had seen in #1 established my mindset for what then came next. I was, unconsciously, using #1 as a baseline/reference point. #2 is a completely different image and needed to be judged on its own merits, not as a comparison with #1. When I did that, I saw the beauty of #2.

Hope all that makes some sort of sense. Just seemed relevant in terms of thinking what we set beside what.

[Bobobird]

The first one is a real beauty. Well done.

Hey that was exactly how i saw the other 2 !!!!!!

Now they look just as grand.

[ScoutR]

All three work for me. The lighting is sooo nice.

Wendy

[Goldcoastgolfer]

I love all three but that first one is gorgeous. That's another one waiting to be hung up on someone's wall.

[Daisy Mae]

Thanks everyone

I totally get you Donald. I posred the first one and wasn't going to post up the other two as they were so different. When I decided to post them I would have rather atarted a new rgread to seperate them from No 1 but that just seemed greedy.

Thanks for the tip on noise Geoff