And both worked well. I prefer the B&W, but that is usually the way I go anyway. Nicely done on both of them.
Susan, now that is one clean looking Bronco!! Don't they use salt on the roads in PA?
That explains why I haven't seen a 1984 Bronco in that nice of condition since 1984!!
Nice shot Ryo, this must be viewed full size.
I am certain that bike would not get you into any trouble...it does not look fast at all
I think I prefer your close-ups of details, but that is just me.
It is a shame that the chrome appears to be bubbling off the RR grill
I just put this up on the 36" screen...WOW, it does jump. big difference from looking at it on my phone!!
For such a nice photo, your friend should at least let you have it for the weekend...in warmer weather that is
He has actually offered to enroll me into superbike school at NJMP to run BMW S1000RR's!! While its no Turbo Busa, it will do...it will do!
Ryo
Trying to capture moving cars, for me is not easy or straight forward as I expected.
_MG_8833 by CvsN2013, on Flickr
_MG_8828 by CvsN2013, on Flickr
_MG_7952 by CvsN2013, on Flickr
I was using a 50mm f5.0 at 1/60th ISO 200 for the first two and 100 for the last. The first two are in a tunnel that gets relatively high traffic, so it served as a great place to work the settings for low light shots, and get dialed in. So the images did not come out as well, as expected. These cars were traveling at 25-30mph so there was a need for the 1/60th but I needed f7.1 or higher and for cars over 50mph 1/125 is sufficient to get wheel rotation and back ground blur. I also learned that you need to pick a part of the subject (a headlight, center hub on wheel, driver) to focus on and follow as you pan.
~Kev