I would like C&C on this pic. Thank, Bruce
Helpful Posts: 0
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: Flower (5-25-12)
-
25th May 2012, 07:10 AM #1
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Carrollton, Georgia (USA)
- Posts
- 2,757
- Real Name
- Bruce
Flower (5-25-12)
Last edited by Digital; 25th May 2012 at 07:17 AM.
-
25th May 2012, 02:24 PM #2
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Darjeeling
- Posts
- 378
- Real Name
- pinaki
Re: Flower (5-25-12)
I am new to this site.What i can see grossly is that pic is not sharp.It may be due to movement or focusing problem.Was it taken by a handheld camera?Another thing is due to harsh light details are lost.I think experts will give u appropriate advice for imorovement.Good try.
-
25th May 2012, 02:48 PM #3
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- New England
- Posts
- 8,848
- Real Name
- Dan
Re: Flower (5-25-12)
It's a matter of personal preferences, but for my tastes, this is overcooked. The color and luminance in the middle look very unnatural. However, perhaps that is your intent.
-
25th May 2012, 03:45 PM #4
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
- Wick, Caithness, Scotland.
- Posts
- 2,609
- Real Name
- Sharon
Re: Flower (5-25-12)
Overcooked was the word that flew to my mind too. Bruce... ease up on the PP and give the flower a chance to shine.
-
25th May 2012, 09:39 PM #5
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Carrollton, Georgia (USA)
- Posts
- 2,757
- Real Name
- Bruce
Re: Flower (5-25-12)
Thank you for all your comments. This rose was edited in LR, and it was my intent to alter the original pic.
The pic was not handheld - shot on a tripod using natural light.
In regards to sharpness you can see the veins in the petals upon magnification in LR 4
Is t possible that with editing you increase the noise?
Thanks again for all your comments, and taking your time to view the pic. Bruce
Reply With Quote