-
5th September 2012, 02:52 AM
#1
Cable Bridge
f8 1/320s iso100 canon 5dmk3 16/35
-
5th September 2012, 05:54 AM
#2
Re: Cable Bridge
f8 1/320s
iso100 rework
-
5th September 2012, 07:06 AM
#3
Re: Cable Bridge
oh, I really like the reflection of the cables in the water. Nice detail!
-
5th September 2012, 10:48 AM
#4
Re: Cable Bridge
It doesn't seem level to me. Kind of distracting that the bridge looks to be going down hill.
The second one is definitely better.
-
5th September 2012, 01:27 PM
#5
Re: Cable Bridge
With the title emphasis on the cables, the saturation in the second one makes the cables stand out better.
-
5th September 2012, 07:06 PM
#6
Re: Cable Bridge
level bridge, Thanks for the input everyone
-
5th September 2012, 07:21 PM
#7
Re: Cable Bridge
And the side benefit of straightening removed what I thought was too much distracting foreground in the lower left. I felt too inexperienced to comment on it until I saw the new photo. Now I really see the bridge. It's a beautiful shot and the reflections and colors are really nice.
-
5th September 2012, 08:46 PM
#8
Moderator
Re: Cable Bridge
Hi there Jack,
Not to be a pedant, but to pass on a tip;
If you do a demo crop around something that should be vertical, for example these bridge columns near the centre of the image, you can easily detect when things (still) aren't quite right.
![Cable Bridge](https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=24434&d=1346877605)
When possible, doing it from a water reflection (vertical by nature) is far more reliable than a 'horizon'.
The only thing to be wary of is not doing it nearer the edges of frame if the camera was pointed up or down a bit - then you'd have to even up the tilt.
The second processing is much better for seeing the cables, as Frank said.
Cheers,
-
6th September 2012, 12:11 AM
#9
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules