Hi,I like HDRI much.Dividing a shot in two equal parts is not the best solution.(ie the 5th)
Thank you.
Radu Dinu
Hi Vandenberg - You don't say what software you've been using, nor the camera set-up. Nevertheless, the images are interesting examples of photo-realistic HDR. On the last image, you have managed to capture the colour of the stain-glass and details of the pillars and statue in the foreground. I wonder if more detail of the angel and its wing might be available in your captured files?
Cheers
David
Nice..very nice...except for the first one...its too blurry for me..maybe not the best subject matter for HDR... Butt he one with the pipe organ are nice and the 4 th one is very cool..
Hi Vandenburg,
Interesting series, the most obvious problem I see is the difference in colour temperature between 4 and 5, since 4 is looking quite warm compared to the rest.
Is there a reason why we shouldn't see the top of the nicely exposed stained glass window in 6?
I like the composition with the statues, pillars and window.
Regards,
3 and 4 for me. I wish I could photograph the inside of a church, when I asked the vicar wanted money. lol
I love hdr and photos of architecture/statuary. To my unseasoned eye, these look great!
I like these, too. I like the use of HDR to enhance something and not to become and end in itself, as in "special effects", and I think he's done this well here.
I love 2, 3 and especially 4. The lighting is very nice and looks tonemapped very nicely. I am not a fan of surreal HDR for the sake of it (although it has it's place and I like some) and these have both realistic quality whilst having an unusual surreal aspect to the light.
forgot this post, sorry
thanks for all the nice reactions