I like the shifting focal length effect in '250mph', but it doesnt work quite so well (for me) with the house, looks a little like 80's special effects...
Hi Will,
Truth be known, I was after the top shot (the location is just around the corner from where I live) -- setup camera - took the shot (or about 3 actually) and then thought "Hmmm - well that was easy - what else can I do while I'm here (the alternative being to drive back home and listen to kids fight/argue!) ... so 2 & 3 were just a fun bit of playing
is the first a crop or a stitch?
excellent pictures Colin.
i'll be very thankful if u like to teach us little bit about 2nd picture. (also 3rd).
Last edited by Joy; 12th September 2009 at 10:43 AM. Reason: communication error
Hi Joy,
#2 & #3 are the effect you get when you zoom a lens between different focal lengths whilst the shutter is open.
Shot #2 was (off memory) about a 10 second shot - and I moved the lens to a new focal length about once every second. Shot #3 was zoomed continuously from 70mm to 200mm (EF 70-200 F2.8L IS USM lens for that one).
Does that help?
Hi Colin....I like the "home on the range"...reminds me of my roots. I see you are having some fun too. If you break the time-space continuum we expect you to fix it in time.
Chuck
LOL
So, is that another of your income streams, or more literally, just to put food on the table? (only kidding)
Back on topic; I like #1 and #3 of the original post best.
As we'd expect from you, good compositions, etc.
#1: I was struck by the geology of the landscape (if that's the correct use of the word), by how the land is SO flat with the hills 'diving into it' almost.
#2: You seem to have the size of each successive 'step' in the zoom range ideal, but the result just doesn't do anything for me, sorry
#3: Not much traffic in NZ, eh? (unless it is all queued up behind the camera ) these shots can be tricky to pull off properly, but as usual, you have
Hi Dave,
To be honest, I've never really thought much about the geology of New Zealand, although as a rule it's probably a good generalisation to say that it's realatively flat towards the coast, with mountains (up to some 12,000 feet) in the middle (especially the south island where the Southern Alps runs the entire length of the island).
No, no traffic que behind me (although I did keep checking that I wasn't about to be torpedoed by some boy racer doing 250MPH in a souped up Subaru!) This was somewhat of a back country road -- can't recall any traffic the entire time I was there (major bypass next block over, which probably explains why).
Sorry you didn't like #2 (I do aim to please!) - it was the first time I'd had a play with that "technique" -- I tried a few variations -- some variations definately work better than others. Not a shot for any canvas prints though (although not sure if #1 will "cut the mustard" - I haven't taken a look at it on my big screen yet).
On #2 Colin, I think it is more a case of 'wrong subject' and it was worth the practice.
And besides, who am I to say (it's only my warped perception)
One day you will find a better subject and blow our woolen socks off
Colin,
The first picture appears very attractive to me. I much prefer this original one, rather than other cropped versions. it has a nice balance in composition and color. I wish I had a farm like this
Great work as usual!