Hi Jim, it is always good the experiment and learn new things. You not only learn what works well but you may also learn what doesn't work so well.
What are you trying to achieve in this image? That is, what was it about the scene that you liked when you looked at it and convinced you to snap the shutter?
Different folks like a wide variety of different looks in images and for me that is usually a simpler image with a relatively clear separation between the subject and background. There are several things that can provide that separation; color, contrast, focus, size, vibrancy, busyness, etc.
Here you clearly have a focus separation but for me there is still a lot of competition from the background with very similar color, contrast and busyness. So for me it works, but the separation could be more apparent and possibly work better.
Last edited by FrankMi; 12th October 2012 at 02:51 PM. Reason: spelling, grammar
I think, Jim, I would try a crop from the top and right side to give more prominence to the intended subject.
Last edited by JimFred; 12th October 2012 at 06:25 PM.
It certainly looks better without the frame which adds yet another dimension.
You do have the focal seperation at my maximum tolerance here and I am afraid it makes me a little dizzy.
Thanks for your input, Sharon. As far as the frame goes, I think I am a lousy judge on when to use one or not. It's just hit and miss with me. I hope the dizzy spell has subsided by now. LOL
Jim, I thought your original version was as acceptable as any cropped versions or versions without frames. To me there is not enough separation between the foreground yellow leaves and the red leaves, which make it difficult to see the yellow leaves without really staring at the image. The yellow leaves are still lost within the red leaves. If it were my image, I would try to significantly darken the red. That may defeat your objective.