Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: NOOB question regarding "keepers" vs cropping

  1. #21

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    northern Virginia suburb of Washington, DC
    Posts
    19,064

    Re: NOOB question regarding "keepers" vs cropping

    Quote Originally Posted by Donald View Post
    My aim with 1:1 images, for example, is that I will only have to crop on one of the four sides, the composition being 'right' on the other three sides.
    If I take your comment literally, you would have to compose the image so the desired scene is on the far right, far left, top or bottom of the frame. Considering the softness that some lenses produce in the corners, wouldn't it be better to compose the image so the desired scene is in the middle of the frame? That would require you to crop two sides rather than one bit it would be well worth it.

  2. #22
    Moderator Donald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Glenfarg, Scotland
    Posts
    21,402
    Real Name
    Just add 'MacKenzie'

    Re: NOOB question regarding "keepers" vs cropping

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Buckley View Post
    If I take your comment literally, you would have to compose the image so the desired scene is on the far right, far left, top or bottom of the frame. Considering the softness that some lenses produce in the corners, wouldn't it be better to compose the image so the desired scene is in the middle of the frame? That would require you to crop two sides rather than one bit it would be well worth it.
    Mike - You identify the very issue that I read about when I started to do this sort of thing. I read an article that said always compose around the centre. But, to be honest, I've never noticed the problem. I suppose if I was printing all my 1:1 stuff at a fairly large size and if I did one as you suggest and compared them, there might be some apparent difference. Maybe I'm just lucky in terms of the lenses I have, but, up until now, the advantages I feel in terms of assisting the process of composition, outweigh any obvious deterioration in image quality.

    But the point you make is very valid and anyone thinking about following my pathway, should consider that issue.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    A Pacific Island
    Posts
    941
    Real Name
    Andrew

    Re: NOOB question regarding "keepers" vs cropping

    It's always preferable to get it right in camera but cropping has been a part of photography since film replaced glass plates. It's just part of the process and one of the little things you shouldn't worry about in general. Something too small in the frame that needs to be enlarged to a point of distortion is not cropping problem but rather the original composition.

    In regards to marketable photos it would depend on who your intended audience is. For example, shots for a magazine often require space on the top or sides for text. On the other hand one of my own regular considerations is the mat which in many cases is very important to the overall presentation.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    17,660
    Real Name
    Have a guess :)

    Re: NOOB question regarding "keepers" vs cropping

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Buckley View Post
    Considering the softness that some lenses produce in the corners, wouldn't it be better to compose the image so the desired scene is in the middle of the frame?
    Hi Mike,

    In theory.

    In practice though, the lens would have to be pretty bad to make any "real world" difference; especially in an image destined to be down-sampled for internet display or only printed small to medium. Correct sharpening will have a far bigger effect.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    northern Virginia suburb of Washington, DC
    Posts
    19,064

    Re: NOOB question regarding "keepers" vs cropping

    That makes sense, Colin. It also explains why Donald hasn't seen any degradation when using only one end of the frame. Unfortunately, there are a lot of theories constantly mentioned about photography that have little practical application, as we recently discussed in another thread. This is surely one of them.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    17,660
    Real Name
    Have a guess :)

    Re: NOOB question regarding "keepers" vs cropping

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Buckley View Post
    That makes sense, Colin. It also explains why Donald hasn't seen any degradation when using only one end of the frame. Unfortunately, there are a lot of theories constantly mentioned about photography that have little practical application, as we recently discussed in another thread. This is surely one of them.
    For sure.

    I think the lab rats need to stop trying to save the pixels and start working on saving their images (if they ever make it into the real world of photography that is!).

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Provence, France
    Posts
    990
    Real Name
    Remco

    Re: NOOB question regarding "keepers" vs cropping

    Quote Originally Posted by Colin Southern View Post
    For sure.

    I think the lab rats need to stop trying to save the pixels and start working on saving their images (if they ever make it into the real world of photography that is!).
    Unfortunately, they are paid for their pixel peeping, not for saving their images... They are supposed to show what they see, up to us users to interpret their results in terms of what we want to do/expect to do with the equipment.

    Perhaps the users should be educated about what the numbers mean in practice, as in some cases the test results do have some real life significance.

    Regards,

    Remco

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •