I just hate it when you people do that. My internet connection can be so slow that I cannot open your images.
Not your fault. In SA we have all the technology - it simply does not always work.
Can't have that!
Try this link to a smaller version and slightly larger than the smaller version
I clicked for the larger version, not because I was going to steal it, but because I have learned that your images are best viewed LARGE. Very nice image Colin...I like the lines formed by the railings. There is a LOT of vegetation (I see your point) but it is not distracting in the photo. Well done.
Colin,
You want politeness or honesty?
Collin not your best but still a nice one.
It reassembles those chaotic Kubrick's one vantage point film shot.
There is a strange very nice softness and film-like moody colors or is it just my monitor?
Did you do something different?
The second one is a nice composition exercise. Definitely a keeper if I had taken it but in your case we expect more .
Contrasting man made things, even if ruoughly hewn, with nature nearly always results in interesting images, and this is a fine example.
Apart from the metal grid, this is all wood, and the different textures of the planking and the tree trunks nicely set them apart while at the same time their colouring show their close relationship.
Wouldn't mind that on my wall.
Colin,
For the second - Balance, verticals, horizontals, angles all work very well. Just needs more depth/space for me.
Cheers,
George
I dislike the first and dislike the 2nd even more.
Not your fault, just my eyes keep wandering all over the place looking at every crack and bit. Need an eye relaxer.
Colin, I would enjoy crossing that bridge and exploring the path beyond. I really like the warm colors of the path and the bark in your second image.
Hi Colin,
What you have missed while walking in that forest are the small things. I think a forest has so much to offer for macro photography. Where are those macro shots?
The bridge is a nice shot but it is not what I would expect of you, I miss a model at the end of the bridge. The second shot is a typical walk around a forest and do not know what to shoot tipe of shot. It simply has no impact.
In a forest I think the photographer has to really get down in the mud to get the good ones.
A personal opinion on what makes an image "different", shooting from an angle that not everybody see objects from everyday.
Are you happy with those shots?
Thanks Miltos,
Pretty much my conclusion too.
The softness is from a processing trick I use - I apply a gaussean blur usually equal to 1 pixel per MP and then reduce the opacity to suit (and in this case masking as required) to try to reduce the problems due to the frequency of the foliage.