I might have gone 1/2 stop brighter, but great overall. Have you got a EF85/1.2L yet?
Thanks, Colin. I will try that before printing it.
And no, not yet. Still trying to justify the Gitzo tripod and all the filters I have bought! But it is funny, just today I was thinking there is nothing else I need to buy and thought of that Lens
Can you think of anything else? My wife would love to know
Is that because you then have to buy her goods to the equivalent value?
Seriously, if all depends on what you want to do and how far you want to go - there is ALWAYS something else to buy! Personally, I'm in the process of switching to the new Pocket Wizard Mini/Flex system (from Plus II's) - and from there there are more Speedlites - CP-E4 power packs (for faster cycling) - light stands - umbrellas (silver reflective / gold reflective / white shoot through) light stands - VALs (Voice-Activated Lightstands) (assistants!) - studio strobes - petrol generators to run studio lights in the field! - fans - backdrops - chromakeys - on-site makeup artists ... the list goes on and on and on!
I agree, but be careful with the sky, it is already blown in many places.
The bright spots through the fence are also quite distracting, so I think they may be worth taking down too.
The fence really doesn't worry me that much because his expression, the moment of capture, the DoF all make this secondary. In fact the horizontal rail on right actually forms a nice lead in to his face.
I think the composition (I assume a crop) is spot on, especially in relation to the fence.
One more PP suggestion I have is to reduce the darkness of that large chunk of tree trunk and diagonal branch that is top centre; make them almost as pale as the more distant ones.
Well done.
Cheers,
Last edited by Dave Humphries; 11th October 2009 at 08:50 AM.
Thanks, everyone for the comments. I completely missed the new replies here, not sure how it happened
And I like your version Colin. And the title too Thanks!
You must have been too busy saving lives!
You're very welcome for the edit - my thinking with shots like these is it's better to err slightly on the side of increased vibrance (which - according to the book - increases saturation, but not for skin-tones). I like to think of it as being more like "the way we remember the scene" as opposed to "the way is really was". Personal choice thing
Good picture Alis ...