Helpful Posts:
0
-
31st December 2012, 12:54 AM
#21
Re: Screw In Close Up Lenses... Thoughts?
Thanks to you Gentlemen for your practical comments. I've learnt that there is a law of diminishing returns - so typical when adding reciprocal values (resistors-in-parallel, vaguely remembered) and I've learned that a spade can be called a shovel if used as such ;-).
-
31st December 2012, 01:02 AM
#22
Re: Screw In Close Up Lenses... Thoughts?
I regularly use a screw-on attachment on my 100/2.8 macro. With that and a 12mm tube I find I can work in the magnification range I like ie a bit either side of 1:1 but more towards the 2:1 area.
The reason for using the "filter" is that it's easy to remove if needs be, even with the macro flash attached, whereas changing a tube is a right PITA.
I have the good quality Canon version, it does look soft through the viewfinder but at f16 the results are just fine.
-
1st January 2013, 06:41 PM
#23
Re: Screw In Close Up Lenses... Thoughts?
I am glad you put filter in commas Bob becuase it is not a filter but a lens ... not sure if this is a shovel or spade description but a lens adjusts the focus and a filter adjusts the colour
-
1st January 2013, 10:42 PM
#24
Re: Screw In Close Up Lenses... Thoughts?
That's true, they are different as are shovels and spades
It's pretty common to call them filters I think, not right but common none the less. So I put 2 bob each way by quoting the word.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules