No.2 Victor,
The subject is (I assume) the bird, not the tree.
I could also say it is looking into frame on #2 and out of frame on #1, so there's another reason.
I might give #2 a bit more 'headroom' - if s/he stands up now, it'll bash it's head on the edge of the image
Cheers,
#2 here as well. + headroom.
Agreed, #2 + headroom.
Me Too! #2 + headroom.
And remember, Victor, you don't have to crop to the same size ratio as the original, unless it has to fit a frame of that size.
So I would try cropping at 5 x 4 or even 4 x 5 ratios. Which would give you that little bit of extra headroom without altering the branch position too much.
#2 for me.
Cheers
John
Yes, chop the first one vertically in half (portrait) and crop a little off the top but leave plenty of headroom. A bit like #2 but a portrait presentation.
I like L.Pauls Idea. I think that will work real nice.
Thanks, good point about headroom!
Thanks. The idea to go to portrait format is very much worth trying. My objective is t use the lessons here on my next photos.
Thanks, changing the aspect ration is something else I should have considered. Very helpful.
I like #2 but would trim the width by removing half the blue sky on the right (so the top branch points to the corner). Maybe crop the bottom to just above the knot. Very nice shot.
I have taken on board the comments, subject to misunderstandings on y part, I think this comes close to what was suggested. I kept it to a standard 11x8.5 size common here for printing. I am still open for suggestions.
As an aside this was the only Egret I could get close to this year. Next year, I will have some better equipment and help finding these birds
Thanks for the comments.
With this orientation, I would now loose about 1/3 to 1/2 of the headroom. Looks good otherwise.
Victor That is a much stronger image now. Its well worth the collective effort I think.
Last edited by pnodrog; 13th January 2013 at 12:48 AM.