Helpful Posts Helpful Posts:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Should I upgrade?

  1. #21

    Re: Should I upgrade to a SLR?

    Actually I went from iMovie to Final Cut Pro X so I Never used seven but I actually like it ...

    Does anyone know if the E-PM1 camera RAWs are supported by Aperture and/or LightRoom?

  2. #22

    Re: Should I upgrade to a SLR?

    What about Pack A Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2W + 2 Lumix G lenses : Vario MEGA O.I.S. 14 - 42 mm f/3.5 - 5.6 ASPH + Pancake 14 mm f/2.5 ASPH.
    Can you tell me the specs for the lenses and wideangle and a opinion on the camera?

  3. #23
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,161
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Should I upgrade to a SLR?

    Quote Originally Posted by someone35 View Post
    What about Pack A Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2W + 2 Lumix G lenses : Vario MEGA O.I.S. 14 - 42 mm f/3.5 - 5.6 ASPH + Pancake 14 mm f/2.5 ASPH.
    Can you tell me the specs for the lenses and wideangle and a opinion on the camera?
    I'm not sure what the pancake lens actually buys you as already have that focal length covered with the 14-42mm lens (albeit it is slightly faster at that focal length). Unless you have a very specific use in mind for a lens, why would you repeat a focal length?

    I find that I do use a normal (50mm for full frame) fast prime as a walk-about lens because it is less obtrusive than my 24-70mm lens. At 14mm, it is really too wide angle for that type of shooting.

  4. #24

    Re: Should I upgrade to a SLR?

    Yeah, you are right I will save the money ...
    How can I know the wide angle of a lens?

  5. #25
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,161
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Should I upgrade to a SLR?

    Quote Originally Posted by someone35 View Post
    Yeah, you are right I will save the money ...
    How can I know the wide angle of a lens?
    With a mFT sensor (crop factor of 2); around 25mm is a "normal" lens (equivilent to a 50mm on a full-frame camera). Anything below 50mm is a wide angle (the smaller the number, the wider it is) and anything larger is a telephoto.

  6. #26

    Re: Should I upgrade to a SLR?

    So this lens is wide angle but it cant be a telephoto, right?
    But the 20-50mm lens with a APS-C is not so wide angle but it is closer to telephoto.

    And the 14-42 and the 20-50mm can change how wide the angle is?

  7. #27
    inkista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,503
    Real Name
    Kathy

    Re: Should I upgrade to a SLR?

    Quote Originally Posted by someone35 View Post
    So this lens is wide angle but it cant be a telephoto, right?
    But the 20-50mm lens with a APS-C is not so wide angle but it is closer to telephoto.

    And the 14-42 and the 20-50mm can change how wide the angle is?
    Pretty much. Crop factors can help you compare more apples-to-apples.

    mft has a 2x crop factor.
    APS-C has a 1.5x crop factor.

    so, the 14-42x2 has a "film equivalency" of 28-84mm.
    The 20-50x1.5 has a "film equivalency" of 30-75mm

    so, the mft kit goes both wider and longer.

    To add reach, you'd probably add a telephoto zoom, like the 45-200 or 100-300 lenses on MFT, or the NX the 50-200.

  8. #28

    Re: Should I upgrade to a SLR?

    I have to go check them out in person... Like you said I think sometimes cameras just don't feel good... My choices ordered now are 1.Samsung NX1000 2.Lumix GF2 3.Olympus E-PM1
    But the wider and longer does sound good.

  9. #29
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,161
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Should I upgrade to a SLR?

    One thing to consider when looking at telephoto lenses (even with a stabilized body / lens) is that once you get relatively long lenses, you are getting into a whole new set of issues. It is very difficult to handhold longer focal lengths, because while image stabilization does help, the photographer is still moving around a lot and composition becomes more difficult. The angle of view is fairly narrow and even the small normal motions are magnified.

    I find that a larger and heavier camera makes this easier, but there is a limit too. Some kind of stabilizing device (tripod) becomes necessary. I don't think I've ever hand held my Panasonic Lumix 100 - 300mm lens.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •