I do not know what you applied to the back ground, whatever it is I personally do not like the effect, my eyes are drawn to it trying to figure it out making the stag secondary to the overall image.
That is the way I see it.
Cheers:
Allan
Chauncey,
I would suggest giving up. Whatever you do to the background you are still going to end up with an image of a stag looking at the camera head on.
Last edited by Stagecoach; 10th September 2013 at 07:48 PM.
It was shot in a heavily wooded area, the background is woods being OOF, not very attractive bokeh.
Chauncey:
Don't give up - help may be closer than you know:
http://www.naturescapes.net/forums/v...e168c54568c0f3
Glenn
Hi, Chauncey. Are you saying this has not had a filter applied? It's a really peculiar bokeh if not that I've not seen before.
Think about what you don't like about this picture and take it as a learning experience. Yes, the stag is nice but everything around it is a distraction. Learn to look at the edges of the screen to see how the composition works as a whole.
Wait a minute I now believe that it must be that new Canon bokeh I read about somewhere.
Cheers:
Allan
It would be interesting to know which 300mm lens you used, Bill?
The lens is a 300mm f/2.8, circa 6-08, no filter, mounted on my 1DsMkIII. Settings>ISO 400, 1/30, f/2.8. I shot through a "window" of dense foliage, kinda like layers of chain link fencing.
I could crop it as the image is almost 20x16...had to merge to include the entire deer or, select it and change the background. Am unsure as of yet.
Hi Wim,
I would try blurring the background, and lighten the stag's face/chest somewhat.
But that's probably not the 'object d'art' you are looking for.
Kregards, Rudi
Chauncy, Given it's a nature shot, but you want a style to the image I'd suggest :-
1) Blur the background a little
2) make background monochrome
3) consider a faded border
The closest I have come to trying such a style was a couple of years ago when I was trying to present a group of fungi images.