Donald,three of them were sprachling about within one metre of my feet,too dodgy trying to move quickly.....amazing how high some were louping....
I am stunned. Great pictures Donald. How did you manage to get the noise out of the picture without destroying all the details? My 40D is a real noise monster at ISO1600.
I will have to reload the page, I can only see one colour photo in the first post.
Great shot like everyone has said, but then we should not be surprised, I can't imagine Donald putting up a dud shot!
What intrigues me is the high ISO, and the very fast speed, and how they work. and yet no noise that I can see.
As always this is a great place to learn. And a great thread to read.
Just reloaded, I can see why people like the B/W shot, looks like it almost came in the lens.
So close, and sharp, so what do I like.
The colour one, not because it is colour, because of the way it is in the frame, looks "sleeker" to my eye. I would have liked it more if it had posed better for you.
I wanted the "arch" to go the other way, a little like a moon crescent.
But we can only shoot what we are given, and I note how many you took to get these shots.
Indicates the challenge it is to get it right, and a little luck is an important element. Something that elludes us so often.
Love the work.
Last edited by rawill; 8th October 2013 at 07:16 PM.
Already, one day later, you (or at least I) can start to see the improvement. Like I said, I think it's just about practice and more practice. You definitely start to 'get a feel' for how the fish are behaving.
Robin & Robert - It's nothing more complicated than application of what I learned on here, from Colin in the first instance. That is, "Get the exposure correct". Even then, I thought I would find myself resorting to use of the NIK Dfine 2 Noise Management software, but I did not need to. In addition, these are quite heavily cropped final images. So, that lesson has served me well
For exposure purposes, the water in the background was at the extreme right-hand side on the histogram in the camera. I have worked out that, with the 40D, you can push whites to what seems to be too far. In other words, in the camera,it indicates (via the blinkies) that you have over-exposed. But when you take it into Raw Processing software, you find that, in fact, you have not. I knew that would give me detail and that I could wind back the exposure when I started to work on it with DxO Pro 8 Processing software.
Robin,don,t knock till you,ve tried it......
Good shots and for what it is worth, I believe that shooting FooW (fish out of water) is soooooooooo much harder than BiF (birds in flight), it has to be more akin to IiF (insects in flight)
and I rarely attempt IiF because it's so hard, but concur that with them also, standing still and choosing a good spot shoot (after some careful observation) is preferable to chasing about after them.
Great thread,