You've certainly been in some dramatic landscapes recently. For me I prefer your more 'foggy' one in an earlier post (even though it made we want to see behind the fog. I would crop some of the grass foreground and maybe make a square photo (for some reason I currently like square photos
Yes, cropping the foreground, but not losing it entirely would be my starting point.
At the moment there is a conflict between the foreground and background with both competing to be the 'main attraction'.
And there is a problem with scale. It appears as though you either have giant grass or miniature trees. There isn't a gradual perspective fade here.
Certainly a scene which is worth a bit more experimentation.
I agree with Geoff. Crop most of the foreground and especially whatever that object is on the right in the grass.
Kathy, IMHO you did a good job on the crop.
Bruce
I think it's a great shot as it is!
I've been there several times, both near and far and in both summer and winter. This is as good a shot as any I've seen.
As to the crop suggestion, that's one opinion. Mine is that the foreground adds depth to the image and conveys the height of the obelisk better than without the foreground. I wouldn't change it!
Thanks for sharing.
Zen
Looks like you pushed up the saturation and contrast a touch where were going to be my suggestions. I think your grass crop could be taken up to just where the slight demarcation between light and dark occurs. . Did you add a slight vignette? I like the effect (I have no real consistency in my preferences for vignetting, I'm in a pro-vignetting phase at present).
Really nice shot
Very nice.
Absolutely gorgeous...
Crop looks great!
By cropping, the focus of attention felt on the tower; otherwise it was divided more in favor of the foreground
Well done
Kathy - the 2nd crop is better. Very well done. Beautiful.
Yep - the crop nails it.