Dahlia's/Critters

[rudi]

I am trying out some Nik plug ins.
Are those pictures overprocessed ?
All comments welcomed.
Kr, Rudi
1:
2:
3:
4:

[Downrigger]

I struggle with what "overprocessed" is. These are striking - I think they succeed. Is it likely (especially for the first three) that one would encounter so brightly presented a blossom against such a subdued background in the garden? If not, one could call these "overprocessed". Are they compelling and successful? (I think they are) If so, then one could say they are not.

You raise a good question... Hopefully it will generate some helpful input.

[Geoff F]

#1 is possibly a fraction 'harsh' in the centre but nothing serious. The others look fine to me. #3 is probably the one which is most at risk from over processing but although it is bright and sharp I think it still works OK as you currently have it.

Dahlias are tricky to photograph - as I know all too well.

[Stagecoach]

Hi Rudi,

In my view 1, 2 & 4 could be pushed more and 3 is spot on. One of the areas of concern I find when working on images such as these is the vast difference in appearance on the monitor depending upon my room lighting.

A very nice series.

Grahame

[rudi]

Mark, Geoff and Grahame,

Thanks for comments/suggestions, really appreciated.
Kr, Rudi

[DanK]

They don't look overprocessed to me, but they look like they might be a tad underexposed. They could be brightened in post.

[rudi]

I appreciate your comment Dan,
Thanks,
Kr, Rudi