Originally Posted by Austin Luker But with high aperture come diffraction something you have to watch for in night time landscapes since keeping things sharp is one of your main goals! Hi Austin, In theory yes - in practice though, I find that appropriate sharpening more than compensates even for large prints @ normal viewing distances.
Originally Posted by Colin Southern No worries Here's a couple of examples ... the first was shot at F32 (first image) And the 2nd at F2.8 ... (2nd image) I see. It is a world of difference. Originally Posted by Austin Luker But with high aperture come diffraction something you have to watch for in night time landscapes since keeping things sharp is one of your main goals! Could you explain further about how diffraction can make a photo less sharp? Thx.
Originally Posted by atlantean Could you explain further about how diffraction can make a photo less sharp? Thx. Here's a very detailed explanation as to the effect of diffraction on image sharpness: https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tu...hotography.htm However, as Colin has mentioned, proper sharpening in post-processing can make up for a lot of it. Roger
Forum Rules