Ah well, at least they let you keep it. I keep hearing crazy stories about aviation security. Had one myself a few years ago ... checked in for a flight that didn't require going through security - but due to a gate change - we ended up going through security anyway. They weren't too happy about my swiss army knife on my belt (check it or lose it) ... even though I'd flown in to the airport with it on my belt earlier in the day ... sitting in the cockpit with the flight crew the entire way!
But one always has to remember the two rules of aviation security (1) They're always right, and (2) if you think they're wrong, re-read (1)!
One reason I told her about the ashes is that I didn't know the rules and suspected that lots of people including the officials didn't know them. (Notice that we're finally back on topic.) That's because this was only a year after 9/11. So, I protected myself to the extent that I could by being upfront about the ashes. It was not a concern, at least not back then.
Even when you think they'd know the rules, we still get stories like this ...
http://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/travel...bled-girls-mum
Followed by ...
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post...ear-bomb-gaffe
"The officer will not face formal disciplinary action."
Sheesh!
Tell that story to the 6-year-old American boy who had his offense of "sexual harassment" put permanently on his school record for having kissed the hand of a 6-year old classmate. The two consider themselves boyfriend and girlfriend. The school principal was able to talk the school superintendent into changing the offense from "sexual harassment" to "misconduct." Yet the officer at the airport has had no official reprimand.
Mind you, in this crazy world, I can almost read the TAIC report now ...
"Investigators traced the source of the explosion that caused the crash of flight abc123 with the resulting loss of 212 lives to an explosive device placed in fake medical equipment item with forged clearance papers. Aviation security staff under investigation ..."
I had a go with the GIMP. I used Gmic filters. Tone map to gain some contrast and then deblur. Then switched to Fotoxx and did a median brightness sharpen and brightened it up. The smoothness slider on deblur is critical - maybe I should have used a touch more. There is also a GIMP refocus plugin which may well do a better job than deblur. I've not found and installed it yet. Perhaps less tone mapping too.
John
-
You can't make a sow's purse out of a dog's ear (or something like that). Maybe Richard's clients should use a Lytro Light Field camera - no focus required.
Depends on how big it starts off at and how much reduction is possible really. Eg but it looks like I brightened it rather badly
This is blind deconvolution. Bit difficult. The other type is where some on looks at an image and decides what steps to take. It's a rather specialised subject. Plus there are a whole host of deconvolution algorithms about,
John
-
Last edited by ajohnw; 18th December 2013 at 11:34 AM.