Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: The Subject

  1. #21
    FrankMi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Fort Mill, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    6,294
    Real Name
    Frank Miller

    Re: The Subject

    Hi Jack, I enjoyed reading your comments as they articulate much of my own thoughts. I doubt I could express them as succinctly as you have here. Thank you for expressing your views!

  2. #22
    FrankMi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Fort Mill, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    6,294
    Real Name
    Frank Miller

    Re: The Subject

    Hi Ady, I am pleased that you found the image worth exploring and commenting in such detail on. For a photographer there is no greater honor than that which is bestowed when a photograph receives this much attention. Thank you for your comments.

  3. #23
    FrankMi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Fort Mill, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    6,294
    Real Name
    Frank Miller

    Re: The Subject

    Quote Originally Posted by Brev00 View Post
    If one were to look at the story of the shot and that might be a relevant way since we are talking about the subject (a story element), the person waving is the center of the story and therefore the subject. The fact that he is dressed in a red jacket against the mostly green and gray scene gives him a certain amount of color weight. The poles seem to echo his raised arm giving him a sense of power (a la a conductor). The lock, itself, is foreground in this analysis, the man with the yellow fence is midground, and the rest of the image is background. The man is also at the intersection of two main leading lines, the seam of the lock and edge of the canal. One's eye must stop with him before continuing to view the excellent photo.
    These comments, Larry, probably come closest to the thoughts in my mind as I viewed the composition in my viewfinder, although I certainly didn't consider at that time, all of the intertwining elements that you have presented.

    All of the ideas that are presented here as to what the subject is are valid because they belong to each of the Viewers. Certainly my thoughts on what constitutes The Subject have been altered by the views posted here and I am starting to think that it may not be a bad idea to be a bit less directive at times in identifying the subject and let the viewer enjoy the image for what they resonate with.

  4. #24
    Moderator Dave Humphries's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Windsor, Berks, UK
    Posts
    16,748
    Real Name
    Dave Humphries :)

    Re: The Subject

    Well Frank, you certainly made an impression with this one

    This is what I have been missing

    FWIW My thoughts were pretty similar to Shane's; "Interesting discussion...first let me say that what caught my eye in this image was the intricate detail on the gates of the loch and then I wanted to see more of where it met the water at the bottom." - although others have said similar.

    Before I had read Shane's words; I had put my fascination with these down to my being used to (much smaller) wooden lock gates, so steel is a novelty - and that I have an engineering background and wondered how the worked.

    I like this in colour, I'm not sure it would work (with this composition), in B&W - that's just me asking to be proved wrong!

    For me it is one of those shots where the rule book goes out the window, it just works, on so many levels - doesn't matter whether you like to see people at work (the photographers), huge structures, texture/detail; the way the sun is highlighting the rivets and rust texture, or a landscape - it is all here, there is so much to take in.

    Cheers,
    Last edited by Dave Humphries; 17th December 2013 at 09:19 PM. Reason: added missing word

  5. #25
    FrankMi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Fort Mill, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    6,294
    Real Name
    Frank Miller

    Re: The Subject

    I always appreciate you thoughtful comments Dave. For the Engineer in you, here is some background that you might appreciate.

    These swinging gates are from 47 to 82 feet high, depending on position, are 7 feet thick, and can weigh as much as 662 tons. The gates are moved by hydraulic struts and as they are hollow and buoyant (much like the hull of a ship), each gate leaf can be moved with just two 25 horsepower motors.

    The new locks, being built to the right of these and opening next year on the 100th anniversary of the original opening of the Panama Canal, will be able to handle any size ship that is currently on the high seas. The current locks are limited to the Panamax specification of 106' beam, 950' length, and a 39.5' draft. The ship I was on was 6" narrower so we fit nicely? The new locks will accommodate a 161' beam, 1,200' length and a 50' draft.

    Instead of folding leafs (or miter gates if you will), the new locks will have a single 3,100 ton rolling gate at each of the 16 positions that will operate much like a pocket door, closing off the lock from one side. The new gates are about 33' wide and almost 190' long. Like the original gates, the height varies due to the large differences in tides between the Atlantic (~1') and Pacific (~20') sides of the canal.

    In the image above, you can see 4 of these new gates waiting to be installed in the far distance on the right.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •