Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Heisler Portraits

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    South Island, New Zealand
    Posts
    651
    Real Name
    Ken

    Re: Heisler Portraits

    "I am still struggling with how this guy actually takes photos. Presumably the above process takes at least 10-20 seconds"

    Answer: it does
    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...o-operate.html

  2. #22
    dragon76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    275
    Real Name
    Dean

    Re: Heisler Portraits


    Unless I'm mixing up the cameras? Maybe he uses the view camera when he has everything in focus and a different type for these shallow DOF shots.

    Remarkable!
    circa 1840 - current; Petzval Lens which resurged as a popular portrait lens for full frame & Medium format recently

  3. #23
    RustBeltRaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    1,009
    Real Name
    Lex

    Re: Heisler Portraits

    Quote Originally Posted by Ricco View Post
    I am still struggling with how this guy actually takes photos. Presumably the above process takes at least 10-20 seconds. But we are talking millimetres in DOF that he is achieving. Surely the subject can't sit that still to remain within the focus plane while Heisler is stuffing around with putting in the film?
    I assure you, he does just that. Fortunately, at a certain level of photography, your subjects start to give you a little more time to really get it right. Check out his portrait of Elizabeth Taylor in that 50 Portraits book. She moved during the exposure, but it's still the one he picked. Which is interesting for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that random events can actually produce improved results.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ricco View Post
    Unless I'm mixing up the cameras? Maybe he uses the view camera when he has everything in focus and a different type for these shallow DOF shots.
    Nope. By definition, only view cameras and tilt-shift lenses have movements, and the tech specs at the back of the book specify exactly which film and camera he used for each shot. With the exception of two (of the Pope, I believe), he used nothing but film cameras. The cover photo is one of those rare ones where he used a conventional camera with no movements. I believe it was 35mm, actually.

    Quote Originally Posted by dragon76
    circa 1840 - current; Petzval Lens which resurged as a popular portrait lens for full frame & Medium format recently
    That lens is famous for the quality of its bokeh. A shallow depth of field is a separate phenomenon. For instance, you could stop down the Petzval and effectively eliminate any bokeh, and it lacks the movements one would need to really control focal plane placement. That said, it's definitely an interesting lens.
    Last edited by RustBeltRaw; 20th March 2014 at 01:55 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •