Helpful Posts:
0
-
12th April 2014, 04:21 PM
#1
Printing 8-Bit or 16-Bit
I attended a Photoshop Seminar presented by a professional photo printer who recommended editing a 16-bit image but reducing that image to 8-bit before printing. His rationale was that 8-bit is the most a printer can work with.
I had not heard that before and wonder if it is true for printers like the Canon Pixma Pro 9000 Mark II which is my go-to home printer...
-
12th April 2014, 05:05 PM
#2
Re: Printing 8-Bit or 16-Bit
-
12th April 2014, 05:20 PM
#3
Moderator
Re: Printing 8-Bit or 16-Bit
Absolutely true. Printer data is hard to come by, but the numbers I've seen seem to indicate that a printer can create between around 375,000 and 625,000 distinct colours; depending on make and model. I look at my Epson 3880, with one black, two greys, a yellow, two magentas and two cyans.
A printer works by depositing variable sized droplets using a CMYK process. Unlike a screen, where the intensity of the individual element can be varied in a large number of individual values, a printer either deposits ink or it doesn't, so far fewer practical combinations exist.
-
12th April 2014, 06:23 PM
#4
Re: Printing 8-Bit or 16-Bit
The Canon Pro-100 has 16-bit drivers: http://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/...xma_pro-100.do. Don't know about the pro 9000II. I print from LR, which doesn't even ask in the print module. I've never converted to 8 bit when printing from LR.
-
12th April 2014, 08:48 PM
#5
Re: Printing 8-Bit or 16-Bit
I like Dan do not convert to 8 bit, I print from Photoshop psd files that are 32 bit on my Epson 4900 which is similar to Manfred's 3880 except that I have two additional colours green and orange.
Cheers: Allan
-
12th April 2014, 08:51 PM
#6
Re: Printing 8-Bit or 16-Bit
Canon Pixma Pro 9000II uses 16-bit drivers.
-
13th April 2014, 03:23 PM
#7
Re: Printing 8-Bit or 16-Bit
Thanks my friends. I have never reduced my images to 8 Bit for printing. I just wanted some confirmation...
-
13th April 2014, 04:32 PM
#8
Re: Printing 8-Bit or 16-Bit
I think Merklinger's book is still a very interesting read, and it clearly concludes (as I had the chance to remark on earlier) that hyperfocal distance is no more or not a very practical approach; not for analog 35mm, not for DSLR.
Lukas
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules