It looks like you are getting flare / internal reflections from an uncoated filter. This causes two issues that need correction; the exposure itself and once that has been done the contrast / sharpness on the flare area needs to be boosted.
This is one of those shots that work best if they can be re-shot, and PP is really a poor second choice to try to restore it. The PP has introduced a bit of a blue cast to some of the whte area; I should have pulled that back a bit too.
Last edited by Manfred M; 10th May 2014 at 12:40 AM.
It was a very quick opportunity to take pictures. This is the only one that did this. I don't expect to PP it to perfection :-) Just looking to learn how to clean it up a bit.
Thanks, I am getting similar results using OnOne with the adjustment brush. Lots of ways to get similar results. Not much luck getting that wing to contrast realistically. Probably too far gone. . . One off topic question; do you take underwater pics when diving?
No; most of my diving has been in the St Lawrence River and Lake Ontario. Visibilty is usually 10 - 15 ft. By mid-summer the algae tint the water rather green. Any of the more northern lakes and rivers are tea coloured. None of these conditions are good for photography, and flash is absolutely useless because of all the suspended matter in the water.
He's also not Grumpy, certainly not in is online persona and I suspect elsewhere.
Used Nik Viveza to dial down the background, history brush to reset the bits of the bird where it had overlapped then fiddled by eye using the burn tool. Both added noise so used the blur tool to knock it back and emphasise the DoF separation a little.
Bit rough and ready as I'm heading out to work but with a little more than 5 minutes you should be able to rescue your shot.
Good job, Robin. The loss of colour in the eye was especially noticeable - nicely done.
I would probably used the Lightroom adjustment brush (well, I did, in a recent snowy owl photo), but I should have thought of Viveza: a much more elegant solution.
Dave
Very well done Robin .. thank you for the explanation. I am not familiar with Nik, sounds like it has something to do with Nikon. Even though I have a Nikon . . . I'll Google and see what else I learn. Thank you. It just goes to show just how much can be corrected!
Nothing to do with Nikon, but is now owned by Google
Ha .. Nik by Google. I Watched a couple tutorials on it, including on Viveza ... looks like a very user friendly tool ! I use Topaz and I am just starting to use OnOne. So many tools to do so many changes. Again, thanks for adding to my learning curve.
Last edited by denisemaine; 10th May 2014 at 01:49 PM. Reason: just to improve my wording