Tried the convolution matrix at standard settings seems to have improved things

[JBW]

convolution matrix


no convolution matrix

[Shadowman]

Nice effort.

[ajohnw]

i tried it on something where the camera resolution is struggling.A full res crop. The radius setting is pretty critical and it takes a while to run on an image of this size even with 8 cores. Doubt if this is optimum but still interesting. It seems to be at it's best restoring slightly out of focus areas. There aren't any on this shot so it sort of sharpens/enhances detail.

View full sized to see any difference.

JPG Before



After



John
-

[JBW]

At Dave's request

[ajohnw]

I'm surprised the iterative refocus work on this shot Brian with the standard settings. It seems to need a radius setting that depends on the detail in the shot.

This is what it does to the canada goose with the default rad of 6 - probably intended to help identify moving car number plates. Took ages to run with that large a rad.



There are a number of convolution matrix operations under FX-Foundry.

John
-

[JBW]

I'm surprised the iterative refocus work on this shot Brian with the standard settings. It seems to need a radius setting that depends on the detail in the shot.

This is what it does to the canada goose with the default rad of 6 - probably intended to help identify moving car number plates. Took ages to run with that large a rad.



There are a number of convolution matrix operations under FX-Foundry.

John
-

I am glad I took your first advice and didn't mess with the default settings.