Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 12-24

  1. #1
    ClaudioG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Gauteng (South Africa)
    Posts
    508
    Real Name
    Claudio

    Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 12-24

    Ok...narrowed it down between these 2.... Has anyone used both or heard good or bad reviews on any of these? The price difference is quite big. As I say IQ is tops for me.

    Any and all advice welcome please!

  2. #2
    dubaiphil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    1,848
    Real Name
    Phil Page

    Re: Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 12-24

    Used a UWA before? Rented one? I'd check the focal length range and how it will work for you first. And don't discount the Nikon 10-24 or Sigma 10-20 in the equation either (the variable aperture, not the fixed aperture which is an 82mm filter thread and therefore maybe more expensive if you already have filters)

  3. #3
    Mark von Kanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    1,861
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 12-24

    I own the Tokina and am very pleased with work that it produced. Phil is wright though, go to a shop and try them, take a few test shots, but be fair buy the lens from them!

  4. #4
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,163
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 12-24

    I have the Tokina and used it a lot when I was mainly shooting the D90. Back when I bought it, you could only use autofocus when your camera had a built-in focusing motor, but Tokina released a version with an internal focusing motor, so even that iminor issue has gone away. The lens performs very well and is extremely sharp. You can get some flare when shooting into the sun. Build quality is better than Nikon's consumer line.

    The main negative is the relatively short zooom range.

    I looked at both lenses when I was in the market; and the Tokina seemed to get better reviews than the Nikon. I believe the Nikon is an older design.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Cobourg, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,509
    Real Name
    Allan Short

    Re: Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 12-24

    As Phil states do not count out the Sigma 10-20mm, when I use my D90 or D7000 that is the lens I most often use, when using the D600 it is the Nikkor 16-35mm f/4, you can guess that I like the wide angle.

    Cheers: Allan

  6. #6
    jordand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Sofia Bulgaria
    Posts
    297
    Real Name
    Jordan

    Re: Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 12-24

    These two are Tokina samples:
    Alternative Point of View
    Wide Angle
    And a link to an old thread:
    Tokina 11-16mm 2.8 lens

  7. #7
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,402
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 12-24

    I am not an ultra wide photographer but, I use a 12-24mm f/4 Tokina Mk1 and like it quite well. I have not been bothered by the flare with this lens that many photographers complain about. The 12-24mm f/4 Mk2 supposedly has addressed the flare problem.

    The 12-24mm f/4 Tokina (Mk1 or Mk2) is a relatively inexpensive lens which is a good value. It produces great imagery and is built like a tank...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •