Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 65

Thread: Newly used LED lighting

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    Newly used LED lighting

    Trying out LED lights...color temp seems to be about 2700 kelvin using Color Checker Passbook.
    What say you about the colors of the artificial flowers?

    Newly used LED lighting

  2. #2
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,988
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Interesting. They look reasonable, but it is hard to say, given that we don't know what the flowers should look like. One thing I have read about LEDs is that it's not just a matter of color temperature, but also that many have an unnatural distribution of colors. E.g., I have often read about a "magenta spike." If there are newer LEDs without these problems, I would be interested in trying them out instead of the halogens I now use for ambient lighting.

  3. #3
    Mark von Kanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    1,861
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Hi, WM.

    very hard to say, the light is to uneven to asses and there's nothing to compare it against, you have under and over exposure so its hard to tell what they should look like, if you could re shoot with more even lighting and give us a daylight shot comparison, we might be able give you an opinion.

    at the end of the day if your using colour checker to compensate for cast, as long as the spectrum is constant, will it matter? (question not statement)

  4. #4
    ajohnw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    S, B'ham UK
    Posts
    3,337
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Illuminating via LED's is a bit hit and miss. They emit 3 colours usually but there are some that use 4. The fact that they don't emit a continuous spectrum can have all sorts of effects on reflected colouration..

    John
    -

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    One thing that I did become more aware of...converting to RGB/sRGB from ProPhoto tends to boost
    exposure between 5-10%. Heed the clipping/don't ETTR as much as I have been.

  6. #6
    Mark von Kanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    1,861
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by ajohnw View Post
    Illuminating via LED's is a bit hit and miss. They emit 3 colours usually but there are some that use 4. The fact that they don't emit a continuous spectrum can have all sorts of effects on reflected colouration..

    John
    -
    Not much use for togging then?

  7. #7
    Peeshan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    55
    Real Name
    Pierre

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    It somewhat reminds me of old film commercial photography. Especially the right-half. That can be useful to keep in mind if one wants to recreate this kind of feeling.

  8. #8
    ajohnw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    S, B'ham UK
    Posts
    3,337
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark von Kanel View Post
    Not much use for togging then?
    People do use them for illumination but perhaps it's easier to describe how they work rather than give instances where there will be problems. The blue they emit tends to be well down to near UV and our eyes aren't very sensitive to it so if you take a warm white type the blue light outputted is more or less the same as the level of green. A lot higher on daylight types. Power led's use this blue to cause phosphors to fluoresce at the other colours they emit. The blue has been called dental blue - same sort that is used to cure fillings or at least very close to it.

    It doesn't surprise me that wm had an odd colour temperature reading due to the wavelength of the blue. As we aren't very sensitive to it the filters in cameras etc probably cut it down rather a lot and can't really measure it. Who knows what some surface will make of it when it's reflected.

    Must admit I am not very keen on them having had the blue interfere with my colour vision by looking directly at the the light they emit. I used them for microscope illumination. A lot of people do as it gives a sort of constant colour temperature for photography what ever light levels are set unlike bulbs. What can and does happen in my case is that the blue receptors get over loaded and retain the blue for some time.

    I'm a little glad that so far displays appear to make no use of similar wavelengths of light. This restricts the gamut but once bitten twice shy.

    Some sources reckon there is a murphy's aspect to the anthropic principle to the blue as well. It coincides with a region where there is a dip in the sensitivity of our eyes. Sound's like we are better off not seeing it.

    John
    -

  9. #9
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Well done, colors look fine.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    northern Virginia suburb of Washington, DC
    Posts
    19,064

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Why not use compact fluorescent bulbs rated at 5500K? What's the attraction of using LEDs?

  11. #11

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Johannesburg South Africa
    Posts
    2,547
    Real Name
    Andre Burger

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    William,

    To me it looks fine.

    Thanks for posting this. After reading the comments I think I will do a few tests with an LED flashlight (torch). The results may be interesting.

    The 2700K does not sound right to me. LED is supposed to be white light?

    Well you gave me something to do tonight. Thanks.

  12. #12
    ajohnw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    S, B'ham UK
    Posts
    3,337
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by AB26 View Post
    William,

    To me it looks fine.

    Thanks for posting this. After reading the comments I think I will do a few tests with an LED flashlight (torch). The results may be interesting.

    The 2700K does not sound right to me. LED is supposed to be white light?

    Well you gave me something to do tonight. Thanks.
    Well I suppose that I could have included that they produce white via a mix of red green and blue and that colour measuring devices that use r g b measurements assume wavelengths.

    John
    -

  13. #13

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Johannesburg South Africa
    Posts
    2,547
    Real Name
    Andre Burger

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Buckley View Post
    What's the attraction of using LEDs?

    Mike,

    How does this sound:
    Fenix TK40
    630 Lumens for 2 hours with 8 AA batteries.

  14. #14

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    northern Virginia suburb of Washington, DC
    Posts
    19,064

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by AB26 View Post
    2 hours with 8 AA batteries.
    For studio work such as was used to make the photo in the thread, why not simply plug the lamp with a compact fluorescent bulb into the wall and forget about the batteries? I still don't understand the attraction of LED lights.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Johannesburg South Africa
    Posts
    2,547
    Real Name
    Andre Burger

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Buckley View Post
    a compact fluorescent bulb
    Emitting 630 lumens? I don't think so.

  16. #16
    Mark von Kanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    1,861
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by AB26 View Post
    Emitting 630 lumens? I don't think so.
    £126 for a torch? expensive lumens!!

    the cfl below £1.49 for 600 lumens....

    Newly used LED lighting View Large Image









    Philips 11W BC Genie CFL Stick Bulb

    Product Code: 190902

    • Pack Quantity: 1 Pk.
    • Lumens: 600 lm
    • Equivalent Wattage: 50 W
    • Actual Wattage: 11 W
    • Average Life Span: 10000 hours
    • Bulb Fitting: Bayonet Cap (BC)
    • Bulb Fitting Specification: B22
    • Bulb Shape: Stick
    • Colour: Warm White
    • Features: Non-Dimmable-Rapid Start
    • Energy Efficiency Rating: A
    • Brand Name: Philips

    Good light quality in a compact shape

    i know wher my money will go

  17. #17
    ajohnw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    S, B'ham UK
    Posts
    3,337
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark von Kanel View Post
    £126 for a torch? expensive lumens!!

    the cfl below £1.49 for 600 lumens....

    Newly used LED lighting View Large Image









    Philips 11W BC Genie CFL Stick Bulb

    Product Code: 190902

    • Pack Quantity: 1 Pk.
    • Lumens: 600 lm
    • Equivalent Wattage: 50 W
    • Actual Wattage: 11 W
    • Average Life Span: 10000 hours
    • Bulb Fitting: Bayonet Cap (BC)
    • Bulb Fitting Specification: B22
    • Bulb Shape: Stick
    • Colour: Warm White
    • Features: Non-Dimmable-Rapid Start
    • Energy Efficiency Rating: A
    • Brand Name: Philips

    Good light quality in a compact shape

    i know wher my money will go
    You should be looking for something like this

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/105W-eq-52...item54068f0f7c

    But ideally with a better cri rating.

    John
    -

  18. #18

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    northern Virginia suburb of Washington, DC
    Posts
    19,064

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by AB26 View Post
    Emitting 630 lumens? I don't think so.
    Charts I've seen explain that a typical compact fluorescent bulb of 20 to 30 actual watts will generate about 60 lumens per watt. Bulbs with lower wattage generate 40 to 50 lumens per watt. I'm using 30-watt bulbs, so that's about 1800 lumens.

  19. #19
    Mark von Kanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    1,861
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    Quote Originally Posted by ajohnw View Post
    You should be looking for something like this

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/105W-eq-52...item54068f0f7c

    But ideally with a better cri rating.

    John
    -
    LOL gotta get me some of those!

  20. #20

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    Re: Newly used LED lighting

    You guys are doing nothing but confusing me.

    I took two images, one using a CF 2700 Kelvin 100 watt bulb, the other a LED 4700 Kelvin 100 watt bulb.
    The base image is the CF bulb, while the belts are the LED bulb.

    Newly used LED lighting

    Was interesting in that although they were both rated at 100 watt, the CF needed a 2/3 stop slower SS.
    Which is better...you choose.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •