Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Not B & W Landscapes

  1. #1
    Moderator Donald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Glenfarg, Scotland
    Posts
    21,402
    Real Name
    Just add 'MacKenzie'

    Not B & W Landscapes

    Every now and then, as old timers on here know, I stray from the path of B & W landscapes and venture into the world of doggie pictures.

    This is usually in respect of my own wee collie, but also when we play host family to a dog whose family is on holiday/vacation and they use of the services of Barking Mad as an alternative to kennelling. We are an approved host family.

    For various reasons, we haven't been able to host a dog for a couple of years. But we're back on the trail now and Daisy has come to stay for 11 days.

    So, particularly all you folks who do action photography, I'd very much welcome your critique of these. Not so much in terms of what's better than the other, but how these stack up in terms of capturing energy and movement.

    Not B & W Landscapes
    40D, 70-200mm f/4L IS @ 200mm. ISO400. 1/180@f11.


    Not B & W Landscapes
    40D, 70-200mm f/4L IS @ 93mm. ISO400. TV 1/350@f4 +1/2.


    Not B & W Landscapes
    40D, 70-200mm f/4L IS @ 200mm. ISO400. Tv 1/350@f4.5 +1/2.

  2. #2
    Plumcrak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ft. Wayne, Indiana
    Posts
    1,548
    Real Name
    Jon

    Re: Not B & W Landscapes

    Donald, in regards to movement and energy I would say you got both quite well. I particularly like the 1st & the 3rd. I think the brighter area around Daisy's head and shoulders bothers me a tad bit. Appears to be a fun, energetic dog.

    Cheers

  3. #3
    csa mt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    503
    Real Name
    Carol

    Re: Not B & W Landscapes

    I love all 3! It certainly appears that Daisy is on her own vacation, not sitting around moping for her family!

    The first one brings a smile!

  4. #4
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,162
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Not B & W Landscapes

    Impressed Donald; you also photograph moving object quite nicely.

    I must be getting old; just looking at still shots of Daisy moving is making me feel tired...

  5. #5
    Kodiak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Montréal, Canada and now Central Europe
    Posts
    1,240
    Real Name
    Edit is OK… always want to learn!

    Re: Not B & W Landscapes

    The only chance I had to figure out where is the front end or the direction it's
    taking in the first shot is the presence of the truffle! :-)
    This "girl" is certainly having a good time and you caught her in fully extended
    postures or moves. Very lively!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    BC Canada
    Posts
    566
    Real Name
    Irene Eva

    Re: Not B & W Landscapes

    Quote Originally Posted by Donald View Post
    So, particularly all you folks who do action photography, .....
    Not that I've done much in way of action photography but Daisy's 'blown away' hair and her feet definitely suggest movement.
    Now you have to brush her.
    Irene
    Last edited by Donald; 5th August 2014 at 06:06 PM. Reason: Moved Irene's comment outwith the quotation tags

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    12,779
    Real Name
    Binnur

    Re: Not B & W Landscapes

    They are all super Donald , but #1 is super plus

  8. #8
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,402
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: Not B & W Landscapes

    I love these... Great captures of a beautiful dog!

    A bearded collie looks great when it is running and its coat is flowing...

    Normally, I like to see a dogs eyes but, in the case of running dogs with longer coats, eyes are not always available to be seen...

    Take my word for it, the goldendoodle below actually has two eyes despite what is shown on this image...

    Not B & W Landscapes

  9. #9
    Moderator Donald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Glenfarg, Scotland
    Posts
    21,402
    Real Name
    Just add 'MacKenzie'

    Re: Not B & W Landscapes

    Many thanks for your comments.

    Quote Originally Posted by Plumcrak View Post
    I think the brighter area around Daisy's head and shoulders bothers me a tad bit.
    Jon - That was me adjusting the sliders in the Darken/Lighten Center filter in Nik's Color Efex Pro 4. I think I maybe went a bit too far with it.

  10. #10
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Not B & W Landscapes

    That is one twist of fur in the first image. Nicely presented series.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •