sun flower

[bnnrcn]

Hi Vaez If you are asking for PP advice for #5, it is a nice image , I wouldn't make a lot of changes. I would add some clarity but not too much ( between +5 and +10) and I would add just a little saturation , not too much (may be +3 or +4). I don't know the name of the 'clarity' slider in LR5 because I have ACR, it might have another name .

thanks so much yes iagree with you say to me pp

[Kaye Leggett]

Great series of shots - particularly 5.

[vaez]

Hi Vaez If you are asking for PP advice for #5, it is a nice image , I wouldn't make a lot of changes. I would add some clarity but not too much ( between +5 and +10) and I would add just a little saturation , not too much (may be +3 or +4). I don't know the name of the 'clarity' slider in LR5 because I have ACR, it might have another name .

dear binnur ttttttttttanks you are a best friend your explain is enough and good

[vaez]

means yes!

thank you kodiak and whats mean white point after bingo?
cheer vaez

[Kodiak]

•
…just send the picture you want me to help you with to my email address.

[vaez]

Great series of shots - particularly 5.

thanks kaye for comment

[vaez]

Vaez,

Too many images to comment on each but a few general comments;

a) You have done a very good job of exploring the different ways you can shoot this flower, well done.

b) In shots such as No 1 you could have framed it in camera so that you did not include the light white areas on the right side.

c) For 7 & 8 great work seeing the pattern of gaps.

d) When you have a good image post it at a decent size between 1200 to 1500 px wide so we can see and appreciate the IQ. When I see small images posted I always wonder why?

Grahame

thanks Grahame for comment and attention
do i must crop the light white areas on the right side ?
i will try next time post with big size
cheers vaez

[vaez]

Very nice series, well done!

David

thanks david for viewing and attetion

[Mike Buckley]

a) You have done a very good job of exploring the different ways you can shoot this flower

For me, that's the primary strength of this series and well worth mentioning again.

In your close-up versions, consider whether the absolutely most important part of the image is sharply in focus. For me, even when viewing them at this small size, that's a weakness in those images. When viewing those images at larger sizes, the larger the size the more troubling that characteristic would become.

[vaez]

For me, that's the primary strength of this series and well worth mentioning again.

In your close-up versions, consider whether the absolutely most important part of the image is sharply in focus. For me, even when viewing them at this small size, that's a weakness in those images. When viewing those images at larger sizes, the larger the size the more troubling that characteristic would become.

hi mike thanks for viewing and comment and you always have good suggestion excuse me late answer because ihave to find mean some word
do you think my pic have trouble in the pp or take a picture?
iuse edit with LR3 after that use whit photoshop chainge size maybe this is trouble
regards vaez

[vaez]

Hi Vaez If you are asking for PP advice for #5, it is a nice image , I wouldn't make a lot of changes. I would add some clarity but not too much ( between +5 and +10) and I would add just a little saturation , not too much (may be +3 or +4). I don't know the name of the 'clarity' slider in LR5 because I have ACR, it might have another name .

hi binnur ido thing you say about clarity and saturation afterthat ithink better crop now this new pic is better or no?

c&c welcom cheers vaez