I was reading a tutorial on 3 step sharpening the other night...I'd like to share this with you...And I think it has POP!
http://www.espacephotos.com/photonet...harpen_eng.pdf
Yes that is a very good article, thank you.
As is the case with almost every image posted to this forum, the posted image is not at all sharp.
Tinypix softens everything, as you know perfectly well.
I think that's something different than implying poor processing skills on the part of those posting images, which is what I and I'm sure many others, took from your comment. Having looked at the above image at maximum size in the Lightbox, I would also suggest that there is nothing wrong with the sharpness. There is an issue we can discuss as to whether Ed should have gone for more of it in focus by using a smaller aperture, but that is another matter altogether.
Last edited by Donald; 10th October 2014 at 05:25 AM.
Izzie,
interesting article, thanks for the link. The basic thought appears to me that you should sharpen according to output size, and not in ACR but consecutively at later stages. Regarding sharpening in ACR, I see no problem with this when developing a low ISO file. With higher ISO values, it is true, noise is increased, but this can be counteracted to some degree in many cases.
Also, I still see very much a value in using the unsharp mask or highpass filter - depending on the image, of course.
The thing I love about photography is that there seems to be infinite room for exploration, experimentation and learning. I get excited by photographs that I see others have done or that I have done myself because they either affirm some small step or reveal areas for future discovery. Our equipment and our experience change over time reaching for but never quite obtaining perfection. For the best I believe lest we become lesser gods and worship ourselves.
Last edited by Abitconfused; 10th October 2014 at 06:39 AM.