On Ice

[Loose Canon]

F/20
1/200th
ISO 100

Two lights fired.

One shot, one frame.

[Nancy Moran G]

Amazing shot! And I loved your other shot in similar thread too.
Nancy

[Shadowman]

Nicely captured.

[Loose Canon]

Thank you Nancy, John.

This is one of those shots that took me longer to decide out how to shoot it and set it up than it did to shoot it!

It loses something unless you tap it into Litebox for whatever reason!

[Mike Buckley]

Well done, AGAIN! It has the appearance of an illustration.

Strongly urged: Anyone who doesn't view a larger version of this image is really missing out.

[terrib]

Terry, that is stunning. I love the colors, the concept and everything about it. And I also like the mystery of not knowing how it is done. Great work!

[deetheturk]

Another wonderful capture Terry

[IzzieK]

Another good one Terry...I have a nit : it is too clean!!! I love the colouring though, almost sepia but stronger. And if you look closely in one of the ice, you will find Terry's face smiling back at ya!

[Loose Canon]

it is too clean!!!

Well... can't say I've ever been accused of that one before!

And if you look closely in one of the ice, you will find Terry's face smiling back at ya!

I also have a potato chip that looks exactly like Elvis!

[Donald]

I want my money back - I can't see Terry's face!

Another superb creation (the picture, not Terry's face.!) Oh, better shut up now.

[Downrigger]

Incredible. It would be one thing to know how this is done, but I think more helpful to us mere mortals to understand how it is that this holds the eye so powerfully. Non-traditional elements, or perhaps traditional elements expressed non-traditionally, but wow, it sure works!

[bnnrcn]

Stunning image, it looks super in lightbox

[Loose Canon]

Thank you Donald. If you can’t see my face then that alone is worth double what you paid!

Binnur, I appreciate you having a look at this. I value your opinion because I know when you see something that might be out of whack you will let me know.

Mark thank you for viewing and commenting.

I would love to launch into a soliloquy as to what I find fascinating and challenging about this type of photography, and what, if anything, holds an appeal for a viewer (which is why I wanted to do it in the first place).

But I will spare everyone the pain and suffering!

[Mike Buckley]

Terry,

You seem to have inadvertently replaced the image in your first post with a wrong image.

[Loose Canon]

Terry,

You seem to have inadvertently replaced the image in your first post with a wrong image.

Um... Huh?

[Mike Buckley]

Um... Huh?

The following is a screenshot of the image now being displayed in the first post of the thread at least from my side of the Internet. Perhaps the gremlins are at work...and winning. EDIT: It's one day later as I write this and the proper image is now being displayed.

[Loose Canon]

Not what I’m seeing from my side Mike!

But I will say that is a lot closer to what I had envisioned for my shot!

Mind if I use it?

[IzzieK]

I want my money back - I can't see Terry's face!

Another superb creation (the picture, not Terry's face.!) Oh, better shut up now.

Donald, it is on the bottom ice on the right. Terry is looking at the right. He has quite a nice smile on it too.

[Loose Canon]

Missed that Izzie!

Handsome Devil ain't I?