Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: If Ansel Adams posted images incognito..

  1. #21
    ajohnw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    S, B'ham UK
    Posts
    3,337
    Real Name
    John

    Re: If Ansel Adams posted images incognito..

    Quote Originally Posted by kintatsu View Post
    On another note, though, AA would have most likely used PS and been likely to use Dodge, Burn, Unsharp Mask, Levels, and Curves, leaving the rest alone. Curves would most likely been used extensively, as would have dodge and burn. Expansion and contraction in the ZS can reasonably achieved and that was how he approached things. N, N-, and N+ without the chemicals would likely appeal to him, as he was into getting it right in the print, where it counts.
    I understand he was heavily into film development variations as well - so he would probably start writing his own software these days.

    John
    -

  2. #22
    kintatsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Regensburg area, Germany
    Posts
    61
    Real Name
    James

    Re: If Ansel Adams posted images incognito..

    Quote Originally Posted by ajohnw View Post
    I understand he was heavily into film development variations as well - so he would probably start writing his own software these days.

    John
    -
    The modification in developments were to keep the contrast within the range of the films and papers he was using. His exposures were generally based on the low values that required texture, and then development modified to either expand or contract the high values to the levels he desired in the final print. Given that the fully usable textural range of most films was ZIII to ZVII, and tests made prior, he could make his shots match his vision.

    Of course, today's digital has a decreased range of usable values, and he would have learned how to modify the procedures with either PS or his own software.

    PS tools like dodge and burn are from the old darkroom techniques, and curves derives from the H&D characteristic curves. Both are from the old film days, so I think it would have suited him using those tools the most. Whether with his own software or PS, or even GIMP, he knew curves and how to modify them and was quite skilled working them to his needs.

    My take is using RAW as the negative, converting to JPEG being the "development," and final work for printing being much like printing from the negative. I think he would have found a similar workflow that matched his style and been quite successful, given his desire to make perfect prints that matched his visualization.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •