I agree, John. In my preceding post, I forgot to mention that while editing, the saturation was quite a bit below 100% and that maybe the bigger problem in the OP image was a hue shift towards red. Based on that, I would have been inclined to take the hue to maybe 55 degs and cut back on the blue for a little more saturation but not enough to significantly reduce the lightness.
It's easy to get confused between "lightness" and "brightness" in the world of color- hopefully we all know the difference, eh?
As to sRGB, one little-known piece of trivia is that the well-respected MacBeth card's cyan patch is actually out-of-gamut in sRGB!
Right, John - I do use profiles when processing in LR, (it's my first step after setting exposure overall) more and more using profiles generated with x-rite color checker rather than the standard collection in the software. I wish I'd done that for this image - I'd be interested to know how doing so might have changed my sense of fidelity.
You may be right about the "red herring", but it's a sophisticated way for me to blame the equipment!
I want to calibrate my cameras but of late it seems they can have colour temperature correction information in them as well - more web research on just how that is done is needed.
I still think you should post the raw on filebin ( there as it doesn't need registering etc) and let others have a go at it. I suspect the fix for some will be easy - not me but I enjoy trying.
John
-