Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: DSLR vs non-DSLR- can you see the difference?

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    401
    Real Name
    Dem

    Re: DSLR vs non-DSLR- can you see the difference?

    That's easy:
    #A is p&s (4:3 aspect ratio)
    #B is DSLR (3:2 aspect ratio)

  2. #22
    ajohnw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    S, B'ham UK
    Posts
    3,337
    Real Name
    John

    Re: DSLR vs non-DSLR- can you see the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicks Pics View Post
    Thanks for putting in your guesses folks! The two cameras I used were Fujifilm SL1000, superzoom, and Nikon D7100 w/ 18-55 mm lens. SOme of your guesses were right, and some weren't, but I agree it's hard to tell!

    The photos originated from each camera as follows:

    D7100 images:

    #1, evergreen, 1/100, f/11, iso 500

    #2, Beaver stump, 1/50, f/11, ISO, 2200

    #4, rabbit, 1/60, f/ 6.3, ISO, 200, on-camera flash



    Fuji SL1000 images,

    #3, rabbit, 1/100, F/4.8, ISO, 100

    #5, leaf, 1/500, f/2.9, ISO, 100

    I got about 65% correct guesses, I think, the, way I interpreted them, ( assuming Haseeb meant 2&4 are DSLR).

    It wasn't my main point to compare the quality of the two cameras, but I suppose it does indicate that if you only shoot things the camera can handle, (enough light etc.) and use them on a screen this size or smaller, and do some editing of the photos, and use only ones that turned out well,the difference is not significant - though some of you could pick out some of them. Not everyone probably needs a DSLR even if they want great quality photos, though some probably do!

    I didn't include long telephoto shots with the superzoom, because I didn't have any long telephoto shots with the DSLR. As for those, such as bird images, I think it would have been easier to discern which were which. I have a FEW bird shots that would be hard to tell from good DSLR bird shots, but far fewer of those than easier subjects especially those at a shorter. range than regular range.
    I did wonder about 3 because the eye is odd. Got 5 right because they "invent" detail when they have problems. That's why the bulb looks a bit odd in the one I posted - it "invented" the rest but had trouble with that.

    John
    -

  3. #23
    HaseebM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Chennai India
    Posts
    627
    Real Name
    Haseeb Modi

    Re: DSLR vs non-DSLR- can you see the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicks Pics View Post
    Thanks for putting in your guesses folks! The two cameras I used were Fujifilm SL1000, superzoom, and Nikon D7100 w/ 18-55 mm lens. SOme of your guesses were right, and some weren't, but I agree it's hard to tell!

    The photos originated from each camera as follows:

    D7100 images:

    #1, evergreen, 1/100, f/11, iso 500

    #2, Beaver stump, 1/50, f/11, ISO, 2200

    #4, rabbit, 1/60, f/ 6.3, ISO, 200, on-camera flash



    Fuji SL1000 images,

    #3, rabbit, 1/100, F/4.8, ISO, 100

    #5, leaf, 1/500, f/2.9, ISO, 100

    I got about 65% correct guesses, I think, the, way I interpreted them, ( assuming Haseeb meant 2&4 are DSLR).

    It wasn't my main point to compare the quality of the two cameras, but I suppose it does indicate that if you only shoot things the camera can handle, (enough light etc.) and use them on a screen this size or smaller, and do some editing of the photos, and use only ones that turned out well,the difference is not significant - though some of you could pick out some of them. Not everyone probably needs a DSLR even if they want great quality photos, though some probably do!

    I didn't include long telephoto shots with the superzoom, because I didn't have any long telephoto shots with the DSLR. As for those, such as bird images, I think it would have been easier to discern which were which. I have a FEW bird shots that would be hard to tell from good DSLR bird shots, but far fewer of those than easier subjects especially those at a shorter. range than regular range.
    Yes I meant 2 & 4 were DSLR. I didn't check anything except allow my eyes to guess.

  4. #24
    Nicks Pics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Michigan U.S.
    Posts
    1,132
    Real Name
    Nick

    Re: DSLR vs non-DSLR- can you see the difference?

    Thanks guys!


    That's easy:
    #A is p&s (4:3 aspect ratio)
    #B is DSLR (3:2 aspect ratio)
    Actually I cropped all of them so that whatever aspect ratio they are now doesn't really indicate what they were. I used mostly neither 2x3 or 4x3, but actually looking back there may be one 4x3, but it's not a P&S one.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    401
    Real Name
    Dem

    Re: DSLR vs non-DSLR- can you see the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicks Pics View Post
    Thanks guys!




    Actually I cropped all of them so that whatever aspect ratio they are now doesn't really indicate what they were. I used mostly neither 2x3 or 4x3, but actually looking back there may be one 4x3, but it's not a P&S one.
    I know. You also numbered your images from 1 to 5 and then GeoBonsai posted two images #A and #B.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •