Originally Posted by
Nicks Pics
Thanks for putting in your guesses folks! The two cameras I used were Fujifilm SL1000, superzoom, and Nikon D7100 w/ 18-55 mm lens. SOme of your guesses were right, and some weren't, but I agree it's hard to tell!
The photos originated from each camera as follows:
D7100 images:
#1, evergreen, 1/100, f/11, iso 500
#2, Beaver stump, 1/50, f/11, ISO, 2200
#4, rabbit, 1/60, f/ 6.3, ISO, 200, on-camera flash
Fuji SL1000 images,
#3, rabbit, 1/100, F/4.8, ISO, 100
#5, leaf, 1/500, f/2.9, ISO, 100
I got about 65% correct guesses, I think, the, way I interpreted them, ( assuming Haseeb meant 2&4 are DSLR).
It wasn't my main point to compare the quality of the two cameras, but I suppose it does indicate that if you only shoot things the camera can handle, (enough light etc.) and use them on a screen this size or smaller, and do some editing of the photos, and use only ones that turned out well,the difference is not significant - though some of you could pick out some of them. Not everyone probably needs a DSLR even if they want great quality photos, though some probably do!
I didn't include long telephoto shots with the superzoom, because I didn't have any long telephoto shots with the DSLR. As for those, such as bird images, I think it would have been easier to discern which were which. I have a FEW bird shots that would be hard to tell from good DSLR bird shots, but far fewer of those than easier subjects especially those at a shorter. range than regular range.