It's missing. Post 49 had/has the chain pulley, Peterbilt plaque and it also had a chain and sprocket. Now the chain and sprocket are gone, replaced by a "Bicentario 200".....bus stop? Kiosk?
It's missing. Post 49 had/has the chain pulley, Peterbilt plaque and it also had a chain and sprocket. Now the chain and sprocket are gone, replaced by a "Bicentario 200".....bus stop? Kiosk?
That's weird. must be the gremlins haunting the board.
I checked on the chain and sprocket this morning for a a better angle. The fender is in the way for a straight on shot.
But I did get a snapshot of the truck with the Peterbilt emblem.
This is my dad's project. It is a early to mid 1940s Peterbilt cab mounted on a modified 1990 Dodge diesel frame. Lots of hand built parts. The frame started as a four wheel drive but now is two wheel drive with a straight front axle.
The 4X4 parts are going under my 1990 two wheel drive Dodge diesel.(a pretty common swap)
As a side note the rectangle Peterbilt emblems were the first Peterbilt emblems. they started in the late 1930s and ended around 1951 or so the 1952 trucks(most of them) got the enameled and chrome (there are a few very rare that were brass and enameled)oval that we still see today.
Last edited by mknittle; 2nd February 2015 at 02:34 AM.
Going back to your first selection ... neither is being selective though the second of your second venture is better .... just going in close is not being selective as a wide shot of a mountain is taken from five miles and a wide shot of a watch from five cm etc.
Being selective on your first shot I quickly found several selective shots and outlined them ... a couple top and bottom probably had useful material outside your frame to really do them justice.
I see now I have come in late on this thead and I only read the first page before posting but of my selections I think the bottom and the block have the most potential and I wonder if a telephoto shot along the block with focus adjusted over several shots combined in editing to have all in focus would not be a quite sureal shot.
Last edited by jcuknz; 2nd February 2015 at 03:03 AM.
Thanks John,
I will take your advice into consideration when I come back to this subject. I walk by it often on dog walks.
Like the job on the pulley and the peterbilt plaque. Nice project. We have a restored 1943 willys jeep.
Mark, it appears you have a bonanza of future shots, just in the old Peterbilt. Hope you're documenting the progress of the truck as well as this is interesting. Is your Dad turning this into a pickup truck? If so it should be unique as, so far as I know Peterbilt only built commercial rigs?
Brings back memories of driving around in a jeep when I was in the service, that and the Weaps (someone may remember what the weaps was). But for pure, unadulterated....power, I don't think anything beat the old Dodge Powerwagon. We used one one time to unstick a stuck D8.
Nice collection of autos in the earlier posts. Nice closeups on the hardware.
Thanks john.
Nice shots of the nuts.
Compositionally simple; so I like that. I'm not totally convinced that all the negative space in the shots is working for you; I suspect that a slightly tighter composition might work better (or on the other hand, I could be wrong).
Mark, I like the first one vs the monochrome, in this case the red seems to add something to the image
For the next two images I prefer the second one, the goldish cast seems to bring out more detail, although I prefer the crop of the B&W one. To me there is a balance between the metal casting/bolt head and the white negative space. But then, not like I'm a professional or nuttin...
Oh Mark...you have just inspired me to look at tools and metals...one week this year I might go into metal stuffs. Not yet. These next three weeks is still tight to continue with P52. I'll play catch up later.
Anyway, I like your project this week...and I am with Jack in his comment. Nuts and bolts are interesting subjects to me, as long as I do not turn nuts myself, if I am not yet.