Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    cornwall
    Posts
    1,340
    Real Name
    Jeremy Rundle

    Re: To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

    Quote Originally Posted by NorthernFocus View Post
    In the southern US where I'm from we use the term "bride" well after the wedding. In my case, my bride and I have been married for 32 years.
    Nice to hear, enduring

  2. #22
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,402
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

    IMO "Bride" is a more endearing term than "The Wife" which is also often used...

    BTW: I also like the Manfrotto on a monopod since I use one of the uprights as a handle.

    As far as cost goes, I purchased mine new many years ago for less than $100 which included the mounting clamp and lens/camera mount. The clamp is long enough to be able to adjust just about any lens/camera combination so that it is well balanced.

    BTW: I have mentioned this before but, will take this opportunity to mention it again. It is often difficult to spot your target against a very plain background (such as sky or water) when using a very long lens. This Topcon Sportsfinder will let you locate the subject before you view it through the viewfinder. If will also facilitate following a moving subject.

    To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

    I am somewhat surprised that some enterprising Chinese company has not developed a unit along these lines that has frames for various focal length lenses; somewhat like the Hasselblad finder shown here...

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Hasselblad-s...item2349b0cbbe

    Perhaps adding an insert like this to delineate the different focal lengths...

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mamiya-SPORT...item337caae127

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,604
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

    Quote Originally Posted by rpcrowe View Post
    ... I have mentioned this before but, will take this opportunity to mention it again. It is often difficult to spot your target against a very plain background (such as sky or water) when using a very long lens. This Topcon Sportsfinder will let you locate the subject before you view it through the viewfinder. If will also facilitate following a moving subject.

    To Wimberley or not to Wimberley
    Richard, that gadget looks like it would be great for static subjects. I'd think that if the target is moving one would lose it from view while transitioning the eye from the gadget on top of the camera to the viewfinder.

    A very simple and effective technique that is taught to bird hunters when shooting is to keep both eyes open. It works for photography too. With the head slightly cocked and one eye in the viewfinder the other eye can look across the top of the camera. When the camera is properly pointed and you see the target in the viewfinder you simply close the off eye and keep tracking. If the target is lost, just open the other eye again. No gadgets and no movement back and forth to/from the viewfinder.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    cornwall
    Posts
    1,340
    Real Name
    Jeremy Rundle

    Re: To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

    Once upon a time when Nikons were proper cameras and had interchangeable heads you could have an "Action finder" you held in front of you to follow the subject

    Action Finder
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #25
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,402
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

    Quote Originally Posted by JR1 View Post
    Once upon a time when Nikons were proper cameras and had interchangeable heads you could have an "Action finder" you held in front of you to follow the subject

    Action Finder
    I believe that Nikon had such an attachment.

    Dan mentioned...

    "Richard, that gadget looks like it would be great for static subjects. I'd think that if the target is moving one would lose it from view while transitioning the eye from the gadget on top of the camera to the viewfinder."

    I have never ad the problem in the split second transition between sportsfinder and through the lens viewing, expecially when on a tripod or monopod.

    I have not used it for birds since I am not a bird photographer. I have used it for spotting surfers...

  6. #26
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,206
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

    Quote Originally Posted by rpcrowe View Post
    This Topcon Sportsfinder will let you locate the subject before you view it through the viewfinder. If will also facilitate following a moving subject.
    Interesting Richard. I had a chance to have a close look at an old SpeedGraphic camera earlier on this week and it was one of three "viewfinders" the camera had. The frame was mounted on the lens board, so it moved in and out as the focus was changed.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_..._format,_1.jpg

    One can see the flip-up finder laying flat against the top of the body and the wire frame in the down position on the lens board. The standard viewfinder is visible as well, and the camera's owner told me that one could also use a ground glass back (right behind the film holder with the dark slide). Amazing a camera from the beginning to middle of the last century with three different viewfinders as standard.

    I guess there's nothing

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    510
    Real Name
    Yes

    Re: To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

    I have recently aquired the Manfrotto version, after positive comments on here as well as elsewhere. Came set with mount for camera on top of swinging arm. It has tension adjustment for the horizontal; and vertical movment, as well as its sliding plate mount. Cost £140 new beats all alternatives, and it is a solid bit of kit. I use it on a tripod. I have two tripods fitted with Manfrotto's heavy duty hexangonal quick mounts which enables me to fit quickly different heads depending on what I am using the kit for.
    All I can say from use so far is that it does the job, even to the nice little touch of the base having a rubber cover to avoid damage by hitting a hard object tilting too far.

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    cornwall
    Posts
    1,340
    Real Name
    Jeremy Rundle

    Re: To Wimberley or not to Wimberley

    Quote Originally Posted by loosecanon View Post
    I have recently aquired the Manfrotto version, after positive comments on here as well as elsewhere. Came set with mount f Cost £140 new beats all alternatives,.
    Careful............

    Have you tried ALL of the alternatives

    As I said I have tried and used or own. Manfrottos, Lensmaster, Benro, Wimberley and some cheap Indian/Chinese ones so I speak from real life testing and ownership over a three year period.

    I own and use, Wimberley MK2, Lensmasters, both types and Benro CF

    The Manfrotto is ok, as I have said BUT, in comparison with the lensmaster at £120 it is combersome, and can not compare with the Wimberley or Benro.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •