Colin
You really must find some models and stop these self-portraits... excellent shot though.
I know, you have a bone to pick with me
Actually, she's a bit of a cutie.....
Wonderful shot, Colin. I like the dark background: I would have automatically gone for a light background for the dark pet, but this works beautifully, and sets off the pink collar, which is a personality touch for Millie. I'm not a fan of the circular matte, but if you take pics like this, you can frame them however you want.
Cheers,
Rick
Excellent shot, Colin!
I like it when you and Rob (and Dave) play with words like that. Something almost impossible for someone like me who uses English as a second language
Two questions:
What do you think about the somewhat shallow depth of field that left her body (dog's I mean) blurred? Doesn't it look better to keep everything sharp? With all those lightboxes I see in her eyes, I am sure you could have gone a little bit higher on f number but wondering why you did not
Wouldn't wiping the nose dry be the same as combing the hair and make up for human portraits? Did she (I mean the Mum) like the nose wet? It has caused a little bit of reflection in the picture that is sort of avoidable unless it is something wanted in the Dog owners' world.
Also I think the left side of the collar is too bright and has lost contrast. You may want to burn it a little bit!
Cheers!
Last edited by Alis; 7th May 2010 at 12:20 AM.
Thank you
It was a bit of a stuff-up actually. I thought I was at F11, but I was still at F5.6 with a 2-Stop ND on, from a previous part of the shoot. So personally I'd have liked to have had more depth of field, but having said that, if the whole body was too sharp then I suspect it would distract from the face and eyes too much. The problem was even "worse" in the shot that was printed on canvas as it was a full body shot, but the owners absolutely loved it. Also, having all the "underbelly" in focus probably isn't a great look. So in summary I would have preferred it sharper, but not tack sharp.What do you think about the somewhat shallow depth of field that left her body (dog's I mean) blurred? Doesn't it look better to keep everything sharp? With all those lightboxes I see in her eyes, I am sure you could have gone a little bit higher on f number but wondering why you did not
LOL - that nose was wiped about 100 times - Millie had other ideas!Wouldn't wiping the nose dry be the same as combing the hair and make up for human portraits? Did she (I mean the Mum) like the nose wet? It has caused a little bit of reflection in the picture that is sort of avoidable unless it is something wanted in the Dog owners' world.
Yeah. I actually saturated it a lot more in the finished canvas version.Also I think the left side of the collar is too bright and has lost contrast. You may want to burn it a little bit!
It was my first animal shoot in the new studio with the new lights so I'm still making mistakes but hopefully still learning from them
Hi Colin,
OK a couple of other things that struck me about the main shot - very minor, but if you're in 'learn' mode, they may help
The soft box reflection in the dog's left eye is smack over the middle of the pupil which might well be natural given dog's head shape, but (to me) doesn't look quite right. It hides the soul.
There's quite a dark area centre bottom of frame (between front legs I guess) which pulls my eye down away from the face.
Those, while very minor, were my first thoughts on analysis viewing of the top image - after the (already mentioned) collar.
I also thought the background choice was excellent and it is a great shot.
Cheers,
Yeah - I noticed it too. Couldn't really be fixed at the time as Millie's head was all over the place, so the employed technique was "shoot a bunch, and hope for a good one" - and as it happens, the pose for this shot was considerably different from EVERY other shot. So the only other option was just to fix it in post, which I probably should have done, although does that mean I'm revealing a false soul? Probably so ... I presented the canvas today and Millie was there with a deathly / fixated total concentration stare ... no, not on the canvas - on a cheese and tomato toasted sandwich one of the employees was eating. Cupboard love rules
How's this?
Probably not a lot I can do about that as it's shadow where the side of the chest blocks the light into the gap between the chest and the wall. If I clone it or raise the levels I don't think it'll look right - and if I change the crop then I'll end up with the eyes in the centre. To be honest, it doesn't bother me.There's quite a dark area centre bottom of frame (between front legs I guess) which pulls my eye down away from the face.
The background choice was easy in the end ... the first two didn't really work!I also thought the background choice was excellent and it is a great shot.
Square one with the white background I like.
What is with the name Millie???? I thought all you South Islanders called your dogs DOG in memory of Footrot Flats
For those who have never heard of Footrot Flats:
http://www.oneil.com.au/footrot/ch_dog.shtml
David
Hi David,
The customer liked them too ... until she saw the black background ones
The breeders called her "Miley" (after Miley Cyrus of Hannah Montana fame), but there was no way in heck that the new owners were going to run with that, so "Millie" it becameWhat is with the name Millie???? I thought all you South Islanders called your dogs DOG in memory of Footrot Flats
"Horse" (the cat) was my favourite character in footrot flatsFor those who have never heard of Footrot Flats:
http://www.oneil.com.au/footrot/ch_dog.shtml
Very nice shots Colin...I like the lighting and non-distracting background - especially the first one. Don't tell her "Mum" but Millie looks a bit more like a bat than a dog in the first shot. Or, perhaps a dog that chases parked cars.
Chuck