Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

  2. #2
    Ziggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,242
    Real Name
    Jim

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    Nice looking rose. I think a single would work better.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    Quote Originally Posted by Ziggy View Post
    Nice looking rose. I think a single would work better.
    or perhaps a triple.

  4. #4
    JohnRostron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    South Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,375
    Real Name
    John

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    One of the 'rules of composition' would say a triple. I find this double quite enchanting!

    John

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South Devon, UK
    Posts
    14,534

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    Just the two but closer together would be another option.

    Showing a fraction more of the background might be an alternative way of making them appear to be closer.

  6. #6
    Moderator Dave Humphries's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Windsor, Berks, UK
    Posts
    16,749
    Real Name
    Dave Humphries :)

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    I also subscribe to the theory that an odd number of items usually works better, but there can be exceptions.

    In this case Brian, I think the 'opposite' diagonal, out of focus, background branch isn't helping, since it separates them compositionally.

    Is it possible to shoot them from 45 degrees further round to camera right?
    ... without having something worse in the background?

  7. #7
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    Less profile, more face.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Dunedin New Zealand
    Posts
    2,697
    Real Name
    J stands for John

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    Odds is good but evens is bad

  9. #9
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,206
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    The issue with this image is that you have two subjects, so the viewer's eyes can't figure out which flower to look at. This generally results in a weak composition.

    For a stronger composition, you would either need to ensure that there is only a single dominant rose in this image or compose in such a way that they appear as a pair (single subject). As for the rules of composition, I remember a well known local photographer once comment and say something like "the rules of compositions should be used, except in instances where they don't work".

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Dunedin New Zealand
    Posts
    2,697
    Real Name
    J stands for John

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    Quote Originally Posted by GrumpyDiver View Post
    "the rules of compositions should be used, except in instances where they don't work".
    "the rules of compositions should be used, except in THE RARE instances where they don't work"

    The RoC are often in conflict with each other so the skill is in working out which is the appropriate one to follow.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: 2 beautiful roses but the composition? Help!

    I love this multiple opinions and i agree with all of you. I had hoped to get an interesting shot of 2 roses both in focus. I ended up with a 'stereoscopic' shot just misses.

    Next time a change of angle, one dominant, and if possible three roses.

    I once upon a time was a pastor and honestly tried to apply Wisdom Literature teachings to my life. The hard part was to figure out just which proverb or teaching applied to any given situation.

    Who would have thought that years spent trying to figure out proverbs would help me in photography.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •