Now
that's what I call "agricultural engineering"
![Smile](https://cdn.cambridgeincolour.com/forums/images/smilies2/smile.png)
(think about it,
compared to if other materials had been used, shoddily or not)
Hi Sam,
Hmmm (I'm contemplating Manfred's thoughts).
For me; this image is about the textures and I can actually see more of those (esp. on the 'beam behind') in the mono version - where it's not hidden by the blue cast caused by the CT (colour temperature) differences.
Although I agree, this has cost some losses in the shadow areas. So I think a mono might work, with another conversion and attention to getting as much from both the lit and shadow areas.
I'm certainly not very practically experienced in this, but thinking about it and looking at the original and its lack of
useful colour there, I'd say a straight 'desaturate' conversion, followed by careful manipulation of Curves will be needed to extract the kind of result I have in mind.
The tighter crop is a valid image in its own right, but I am so glad to have also seen the wider view for context.
Cheers, Dave