Perhaps a bit too bright on the one petal, otherwise nicely seen and captured.
Hi Brian,
I got the same initial impression as John, but this looks well exposed, even the red channel is not clipped, so I don't think you have lost detail in that petal.
The biggest problem I see is 'crunchy noise', this is especially troublesome in the out of focus background areas, so I think it is over sharpened (to achieve texture in petals?), perhaps the sharpening was applied at wrong point in workflow, or the 'crunchy noise' is the result of some plug-in/creative filter, run later.
With regard to the issues outlined in the thread title - the sun shadows (e.g. of one petal on another), don't actually look that contrasty or sharp (at the moment the shutter was released).
HTH, Dave
Okay I am curious... 'HTH'?
The crunchy is definitely the result of too much sharpening. But I shall get there.
At least I am getting there with the exposure.
Part of my challenge is that I am trying to find ways to gt my flower shots to be as powerful as Daisy Mae's work and I have absolutely no idea of how to do it. So I am doing a fair bit of experimenting.
HTH = Hope That Helps (sorry to abbreviate)
Hmmm, that's a tough challenge with what's in your garden, but then I'm not artistic - although I know what I like and (usually) can work out how to achieve it (once I have seen an example).
My thoughts are that Sharon's 'subject image' tends to be quite simple, either as shot, or by strong PP work, and this is done before she applies any textures or second image as a composite. The main thing to avoid (IMHO) is having the detail/texture (or noise) in the main subject image 'fighting' with detail in the second image or texture in any filter effect.
At least, that would be my theory, not that I've tried it.
HTH - (?) just testing
Cheers, Dave
Last edited by Dave Humphries; 9th November 2015 at 02:17 PM.
It appears to me that you have a pretty heavy yellowish color cast Brian.
The greens look off.