Wendy - Delphinium
Steve - School Room
Rodney - @ waters edge
Colin - I've Seen the Light
Rob - A little bit of passion
Jandiep - IHF Internationa Historic Festival @ Panningen NL
Jim - Gold Dust
John - Chicago At Night
Howard - Go To Sea No More
dnomyar - A view of Melbourne City from Yarra river
Hi Kit,
Surely it makes it easier; "#3 and #7 and #2" - job done! No agonising; I like this, that and the other, so tick them all.
Seems easy to me
The theory goes that because multiple choice is so easy; more people vote and the sheer volume of voters (with differing tastes) means the averages acrue for the more popular images. "Popular demand" at work.Originally Posted by Colin Southern
When I used to publish a running tally (as Hall of Fame), it didn't seem that often that there were actually ties for first or second, etc. and even if there were, does it matter?
Last edited by Dave Humphries; 28th July 2010 at 11:24 AM. Reason: added an answer for Colin
Hi Dave,
It certainly means we get more votes ... not sure if we get more voters though. I still think it just looks "healthier" to have eg the 73 votes that we have now than the 25 votes we would have had if it had been made single-choice though. Also, multiple vote almost certainly gives a psychological boost as well in that many undoubtedly end up getting votes that they probably wouldn't have got under a single vote system.
Given the aim of the mini competition "It was all about encouraging people to explore and improve" as Donald put it, the voting system and percentages seem appropriate. For me it is how many voters judge my images to be "worthy" that matters. This gives me a measure of my ability that I can work to improve on.